Advanced Kidney Cancer COE Articles

Articles

  • A Multicentered, Propensity Matched Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for pT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Expert Commentary

    Laparoscopic renal surgery (LRS) has long been recognized for its improvements over open renal surgery for patient quality of life. However, LRS efficiency in terms of oncology and recurrences has yet to be compared. This team attempted to do just that by contrasting ORS and LRS on patients with Pathologic T3a (pT3a).
    Published September 15, 2017
  • Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for High Risk Kidney Cancer

    Adjuvant targeted therapy

    Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) quickly became standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma following their introduction in the early 2000s. They have subsequently been investigated as adjuvant therapy in 4 published randomized trials to our knowledge. In addition, the SORCE trial was presented at ESMO 2019 at the end of September 2019.

    Written by: Zachary Klaassen, MD, MSc
    References: 1. Patel HD, Gupta M, Joice GA, et al. Clinical Stage Migration and Survival for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 2(4):343-348
    2. Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG, et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 387(10032):2008-16.
    3. Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F, et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35(35):3916-3923.
    4. Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pandha HS, et al. Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(23):2246-2254.
    5. Gross-Goupil M, Kwon TG, Eto M, et al. Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 29(12):2371-2378.
    6. Haas NB, Manola J, Dutcher JP, et al. Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Clear Cell Renal Cancer: Updated Results of a High-Risk Subset of the ASSURE Randomized Trial. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3(9):1249-1252
    7. Sun M, Marconi L, Eisen T, et al. Adjuvant Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Eur Urol 2018; 74(5):611-620.
    8. Spek A, Szabados B, Casuscelli J, et al. Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: the perspective of urologists. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24(6):694-697.
    9. Martinez Chanza N, Tripathi A, Harshman LC. Adjuvant Therapy Options in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand? Curr Treat Options Oncol 2019; 20(5):44.
    10. Gleeson JP, Motzer RJ, Lee CH. The current role for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in renal cell cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2019.
    11. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. Eur Urol 2019; 75(5):799-810.
    12. Wood C, Srivastava P, Bukowski R, et al. An adjuvant autologous therapeutic vaccine (HSPPC-96; vitespen) versus observation alone for patients at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III trial. Lancet 2008; 372(9633):145-54.
    13. Aitchison M, Bray CA, Van Poppel H, et al. Final results from an EORTC (GU Group)/NCRI randomized phase III trial of adjuvant interleukin-2, interferon alpha, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with a high risk of relapse after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2011; 29(15 (SUPPL)):4505.
    14. Tsimafeyeu ID, L., Kharkevich G, Petenko N, et al. Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Interferon Alpha and Interleukin-2 as Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Cancer Sci Ther 2010; 2:157-159.
    15. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(14):1277-1290.
    16. Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, et al. Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380(12):1103-1115.
    17. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380(12):1116-1127.
    Published December 6, 2019
  • ASCO 2021: A Quantum Leap in Cancer Adjuvant Immunotherapy - KEYNOTE 564 Phase 3 Trial - Discussion

    (UroToday.com) The much anticipated 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual program plenary session included a discussant presentation by Dr. Rana McKay providing her expertise on the recently presented KEYNOTE 564 phase 3 trial with her talk entitled “A Quantum Leap in Cancer Adjuvant Immunotherapy”.
    Published June 8, 2021
  • ASCO 2021: Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo As Post-Nephrectomy Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Keynote-564 Study

    (UroToday.com) Locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be surgically resected, but nearly half of patients eventually experience disease recurrence. Risk factors associated with relapse include larger tumors, higher tumor stage, nodal involvement, higher nuclear grade, and initial M1 presentation managed with complete surgical resection.
    Published June 10, 2021
  • ASCO 2022: LITESPARK-004 (MK-6482-004) Phase 2 Study of Belzutifan, an Oral HIF-2α Inhibitor, for Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Update With More Than Two Years of Follow-Up Data

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 ASCO annual meeting featured a session on kidney and bladder cancer, including a presentation by Dr. Eric Jonasch discussing updated results of the LITESPARK-004 phase 2 study of belzutifan, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor (HIF-2α), for von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. VHL disease is associated with malignant or benign tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and hemangioblastomas. Alterations in the VHL gene cause aberrant stabilization and accumulation of HIF-2α, leading to the activation of genes associated with tumor growth. Antitumor activity observed in the ongoing open-label phase 2 study, LITESPARK-004 (NCT03401788), led to the approval of belzutifan for the treatment of patients with VHL disease who require therapy for associated RCC, CNS hemangioblastomas, or pNETs not requiring immediate surgery.1 At ASCO 2022, Dr. Jonasch presented updated results of this trial after > 2 years of follow-up.

    Published June 4, 2022
  • ASCO 2022: Pembrolizumab + Axitinib Versus Sunitinib As First-Line Therapy for Advanced Clear Cell RCC: Analysis of Progression After First Subsequent Therapy in KEYNOTE-426

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 ASCO annual meeting featured a poster discussion session on kidney and bladder cancer, including a presentation by Dr. Tom Powles discussing an analysis of progression after first subsequent therapy in KEYNOTE-426, which tested pembrolizumab + axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced clear cell RCC. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study (NCT02853331)1 met its primary and key secondary end points of improved OS, PFS, and ORR with pembrolizumab + axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced clear cell RCC. Extended follow-up (42.8-month median follow-up) continued to show the superior efficacy of pembrolizumab + axitinib versus sunitinib in this patient population.2 This exploratory analysis compared the benefit of pembrolizumab + axitinib versus sunitinib beyond initial progression by evaluating PFS2 for all randomly assigned patients and across IMDC risk categories.

    Published June 5, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2021: Final Results From a Phase I Trial and Expansion Cohorts of Cabozantinib and Nivolumab Alone or With Ipilimumab For Metastatic Genitourinary Tumors

    (UroToday.com) Cabozantinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab have been increasingly utilized for a number of genitourinary malignancies, most prominently in renal cell carcinoma. In a dose-escalation study, combinations of cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) and cabozantinib, nivolumab, and ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in a dose-escalation phase I study. In a plenary abstract presentation in the Rapid Abstract Session: Urothelial Carcinoma and Rare Tumors session at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium (ASCO GU), Dr. Apolo presented results from a pooled analysis of the phase I dose-finding and 7 subsequent expansion cohorts among patients with metastatic genitourinary (mGU) tumors.
    Published February 13, 2021
  • ASCO GU 2021: Patient-Reported Outcomes Of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib: The Checkmate 9ER Trial

    (UroToday.com) The treatment landscape for first-line therapy among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has changed dramatically over the past 2 years. In 2018, publication of the CheckMate214 data demonstrated a survival benefit for patients treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab compared with sunitinib in intermediate and poor-risk mRCC, ushering in the immunotherapy era for mRCC. Subsequent publication of the JAVELIN Renal 101 and KEYNOTE-426 studies in 2019 demonstrated superiority of avelumab and axitinib and pembrolizumab and axitinib, compared to sunitinib in this disease space. These two trials were the first to demonstrate that the combination of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition and targeted therapy improved overall survival compared to sunitinib, the previous standard of care. Network meta-analysis following publication of these data demonstrated the apparent superiority of this combined approach. At ESMO 2020, Dr. Choueiri presented first results from the CheckMate-9ER of the combination of nivolumab and cabozantinib, as compared to sunitinib, in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This first report, which is still unpublished, demonstrated the superiority of nivolumab plus cabozantinib to sunitinib in the first line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with respect to both progression-free survival and overall survival and led to its approval. In a plenary abstract presentation in the Poster Highlights Session: Renal Cell Cancer - Clinical Trial Updates session at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium (ASCO GU), Dr. Cella presented patient-reported outcomes from this trial.
    Published February 13, 2021
  • ASCO GU 2021: The CLEAR Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus vs Sunitinib and the SWOG 1500 Trial of Sunitinib, Cabozantinib, Crizotinib, and Savolitinib in Advanced Kidney Cancer: Discussion

    (UroToday.com) Following presentations by Dr. Robert Motzer discussing results of the CLEAR study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib in first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and by Dr. Sumanta Pal looking at the SWOG 1500 trial of sunitinib, cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib in patients with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma, Dr. Stephanie Berg provided a discussion of these data in the Oral Abstract Session: Renal Cell Cancer session at the 2021 ASCO GU Cancers Symposium.

    Published February 19, 2021
  • ASCO GU 2021: TIVO-3: Tivozanib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Progressed After Treatment with Axitinib

    (UroToday.com) Tivozanib is a potent and highly selective VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in clinical development for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Axitinib is also a potent and selective VEGF-receptor inhibitor now commonly part of front-line advanced RCC treatment. In the TIVO-3 trial, tivozanib demonstrated significantly greater progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.94) and objective response rate (ORR) (15.2% versus 7.5%, p=0.003) versus sorafenib in the intention to treat population, in the subset of patients treated with two prior VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and in patients treated with a prior VEGFR-TKI and an anti-PD-1 antibody.1 The activity of tivozanib after axitinib has not been previously defined, and as such the activity of tivozanib after prior therapy types including axitinib is of clinical relevance. At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary (GU) Cancers Symposium, Dr. Brian Rini and colleagues presented results of the TIVO-3 trial testing tivozanib in patients with advanced RCC who had progressed after prior axitinib treatment.
    Published February 14, 2021
  • ASCO GU 2022: Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinibin the East Asian Subset of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma From the Phase 3 CLEAR Trial

    (UroToday.com) In the Poster Session C on the third day of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancer Symposium 2022 focused on Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers. In this session, Dr. Rha presented subgroup analyses of efficacy and safety from the CLEAR trial of Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab among East Asian patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

    Published February 20, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2022: Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of Neoadjuvant Avelumab/Axitinib in Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Are at High Risk of Relapse After Nephrectomy (NeoAvAx)

    (UroToday.com) In an oral abstract on the third day of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancer Symposium 2022 focused on renal cell cancer, Dr. Bex presented results of the NeoAvAx study examining neoadjuvant avelumab and axitinib following nephrectomy for patients who are at high risk for recurrence.

    Published February 20, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2022: HRQoL in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: CheckMate 9ER Updated Results

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 GU ASCO Annual meeting included a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) session highlighting work from Dr. David Cella and investigators presenting results assessing HRQoL in previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the CheckMate 9ER trial. In CheckMate 9ER,1 patients with advanced RCC were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 240 mg IV Q2W + cabozantinib 40 mg PO QD n = 323) or sunitinib 50 mg PO (4 weeks of 6-week cycles; n = 328). As reported previously, at a median follow-up of 18.1 months, nivolumab + cabozantinib led to superior progression-free and overall survival and more favorable HRQoL than sunitinib. At the 2022 GU ASCO meeting, Dr. Cella reported results of HRQoL analyses for 32.9-months follow-up.

    Published February 20, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2022: Pembrolizumab As Post Nephrectomy Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From 30-Month Follow-Up of KEYNOTE-564

    (UroToday.com) In an oral abstract on the third day of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancer Symposium 2022 focused on renal cell cancer, Dr. Choueiri presented 30-month follow-up from the KEYNOTE-564 trial of post-nephrectomy adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

    Published February 20, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2022: PIVOT IO 011: A Phase 1/2 Study of Bempegaldesleukin Plus Nivolumab and TKI Versus Nivolumab and TKI Alone in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced or mRCC

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 GU ASCO Annual meeting included a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) trials in progress session featuring PIVOT IO 011, presented by Dr. Martin Voss, a phase 1/2 study evaluating of bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab and TKI versus nivolumab and TKI alone in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic RCC.

    Published February 20, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2022: Real-World Assessment of Changing Treatment Patterns and Sequence for Patients With Metastatic RCC in the First-Line Setting

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 GU ASCO Annual meeting included a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) session highlighting work from Dr. Neil Shah and colleagues presenting results of a real-world assessment of changing treatment patterns and sequence for patients with metastatic RCC in the first-line setting. Several immune-oncology (IO) agents and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have received approval for treatment of metastatic RCC in the first-line setting by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over last few years. Limited data exists on evolving real-world treatment patterns and sequences in metastatic RCC patients receiving these agents, especially in the community oncology setting.

    Published February 19, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2022: TiNivo-2: Comparing Tivozanib in Combination With Nivolumab to Tivozanib Monotherapy in Subjects With Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Progressed Following One or Two Lines of Therapy Where One Line Has an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

    (UroToday.com) In a poster presentation on the third day of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancer Symposium 2022 on Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers, Dr. Choueiri presented the rationale and design of the TiNivo-2 trial, examining tivozanib with or without nivolumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have progressed following one or two lines of therapy, one of which was an immune checkpoint inhibitor.

    Published February 19, 2022
  • ASCO GU 2024: Belzutifan Versus Everolimus in Participants With Previously Treated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Phase 3 LITESPARK-005 Study

    (UroToday.com) The 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary (ASCO GU) cancers symposium held in San Francisco, CA between January 25th and 27th was host to a renal and rare tumors oral abstract session. Dr. Thomas Powles presented the patient-reported outcomes from the phase 3 LITESPARK-005 study of belzutifan versus everolimus in patients with previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

    Published January 28, 2024
  • ASCO GU 2024: Insights from CheckMate 67T and Patient-Reported Outcomes in LITESPARK-005 for Advanced RCC

    (UroToday.com) The 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary (ASCO GU) cancers symposium held in San Francisco, CA between January 25th and 27th was host to a renal and rare tumors oral abstract session. Dr. Ulka Vaishampayan delivered the discussant for the preceding two presentations:

    • Subcutaneous nivolumab (NIVO SC) versus intravenous nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety results from CheckMate 67T
    • Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants with previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma: Patient-reported outcomes in the phase 3 LITESPARK-005 study
    Published January 28, 2024
  • ASCO GU 2024: Overall Survival Results from the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 Study of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab vs Placebo for the Treatment of Clear Cell RCC

    (UroToday.com) The 2024 GU ASCO annual meeting featured an oral abstract renal cell carcinoma session and a presentation by Dr. Toni Choueiri discussing overall survival results from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo for the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Between 1973 and the present, 17 randomized controlled studies with a combined >12,000 enrolled patients investigated adjuvant therapies in RCC, with no observed survival improvement. The randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 study showed that adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival compared with placebo following nephrectomy in participants with clear cell RCC at an increased risk of recurrence.1 The primary endpoint of disease free survival was met at the first interim analysis (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87) and overall survival (a key secondary endpoint) results were immature at the last analysis. More any-grade and grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events occurred with adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo, but no clinically meaningful deterioration of health related quality of life was observed. As such, adjuvant pembrolizumab is approved for use in patients with RCC at intermediate-high or high risk of recurrence following nephrectomy or following nephrectomy and resection of metastatic lesions (M1 NED). At the GU ASCO 2024 annual meeting, Dr. Choueiri reported results from the third prespecified interim analysis with a median follow-up of ~57 months.

    Published January 27, 2024
  • ASCO GU 2024: Subcutaneous Nivolumab Versus Intravenous Nivolumab in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety Results From CheckMate 67T

    (UroToday.com) The 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary (ASCO GU) cancers symposium held in San Francisco, CA between January 25th and 27th was host to a renal and rare tumors oral abstract session. Dr. Saby George presented the late-breaking pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety results from CheckMate 67T comparing subcutaneous and intravenous nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

    Published January 28, 2024
  • ASCO GU 2024: The Role of Radiation in Primary Tumor and Distant Sites in Managing Renal Cell Carcinoma

    (UroToday.com) The 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary (ASCO GU) cancers symposium held in San Francisco, CA between January 25th and 27th was host to a session addressing the incorporation of radiation therapy, theranostics, and biomarkers into the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Dr. Sophia Kamran discussed the role of radiation therapy for the management of RCC primary tumors and distant metastatic sites.

    Published January 28, 2024
  • Association of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio with Response to Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma - Beyond the Abstract

    Immunotherapy-based combinations have had a dramatic improvement in outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, with some patients having deep and durable responses. Developing biomarkers to predict which patients are most likely to respond to immunotherapy may help limit the number of patients who require upfront and long-term exposure to VEGF-TKIs. Additionally, the identification of biomarkers may help further our understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME), enabling new mechanisms and combinations to improve outcomes for patients.

    Published November 22, 2021
  • AUA 2022: Is Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Dead or Alive in 2022?

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting included the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) session and a presentation by Dr. Daniel Shapiro discussing the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in 2022. From a historical perspective, Dr. Shapiro notes that in a combined analysis of SWOG 8949 and EORTC 30947, the median overall survival for cytoreductive nephrectomy + IFN-alpha was 13 months and for IFN-alpha alone was 7.8 months (p = 0.001). Benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy include improved survival, and can also be important for symptomatic/palliative reasons. Of note, among all of the systemic therapy trials for metastatic RCC, the majority of patients had a prior nephrectomy:

    Published May 15, 2022
  • AUA 2023: Management of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell RCC

    (UroToday.com) Dr. Brian Rini kicked off the initial talk of the SUO session at the AUA 2023 Annual Meeting, focusing on the management of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). First, he focused on papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
    Published April 30, 2023
  • Avelumab Plus Axitinib Significantly Improved Progression-Free Survival In Previously Untreated Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in Phase III Study

    San Francisco, CA (UroToday.com) -- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer Inc. announced positive top-line results from the pivotal Phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 study evaluating BAVENCIO® (avelumab) in combination with INLYTA® (axitinib), compared with SUTENT® (sunitinib) as initial therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). As part of a planned interim analysis, an independent Data Monitoring Committee confirmed that the trial showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by central review for patients treated with the combination whose tumors had programmed death ligand-1‒positive (PD-L1+) expression greater than 1% (primary objective), as well as in the entire study population regardless of PD-L1 tumor expression (secondary objective).
    Published September 12, 2018
  • AVEO Oncology Announces Publication of Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial in The Oncologist

    Reno, Nevada (UroToday.com) -- AVEO Oncology, an LG Chem company (“AVEO”), today announced The Oncologist has published a post-hoc analysis of long-term progression free survival, overall survival and safety data from the Phase 3 TIVO-3 trial evaluating FOTIVDA® (tivozanib) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the publication, FOTIVDA demonstrated a consistent safety profile and a long-term survival benefit in patients who were alive and progression-free at 12 months, suggesting a durable clinical benefit and safety across age groups regardless of prior treatment.
    Published February 7, 2024
  • Axitinib Versus Placebo as an Adjuvant Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the ATLAS Trial

    The ATLAS trial compared axitinib versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. 

    Patients and Methods

    In a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial, patients had >50% clear-cell RCC, had undergone nephrectomy, and had no evidence of macroscopic residual or metastatic disease (independent review committee [IRC] confirmed). The intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients (≥pT2 and/or N+, any Fuhrman grade [FG], Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0/1). Patients (stratified by risk group/country) received (1:1) oral twice-daily axitinib 5 mg or placebo for ≤3 years, with a 1-year minimum unless recurrence, occurrence of second primary malignancy, significant toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) per IRC. A prespecified DFS analysis in the highest-risk subpopulation (pT3, FG ≥ 3 or pT4 and/or N+, any T, any FG) was conducted.

    Published October 20, 2018
  • Biomarker-Based Phase II Trial of Savolitinib in Patients with Advanced Papillary Renal Cell Cancer

    PURPOSE: Patients with advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) have limited therapeutic options. PRCC may involve activation of the MET pathway, for example, through gene amplification or mutations. Savolitinib (AZD6094, HMPL-504, volitinib) is a highly selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We report results of a single-arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of savolitinib in patients with PRCC according to MET status.
    Published December 9, 2018
  • Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (METEOR): Final Results from a Randomised, Open-label, Phase 3 Trial

    BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib is an oral inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, VEGFR, and AXL. The randomised phase 3 METEOR trial compared the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib versus the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed after previous VEGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment. Here, we report the final overall survival results from this study based on an unplanned second interim analysis. 
    Published December 3, 2018
  • Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

    BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib is an oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) as well as MET and AXL, each of which has been implicated in the pathobiology of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma or in the development of resistance to antiangiogenic drugs. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib, as compared with everolimus, in patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy. 
    Published December 3, 2018
  • Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib As Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial

    Cabozantinib is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, MET, and AXL and is a standard second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This randomized phase II multicenter trial evaluated cabozantinib compared with sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC.
    Published September 11, 2017
  • Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib As Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial.

    Purpose Cabozantinib is an oral potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, MET, and AXL and is a standard second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This randomized phase II multicenter trial evaluated cabozantinib compared with sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC.

    Published March 19, 2018
  • Cellular and Molecular Features of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Tumors - Expert Commentary

    Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) represents 75% of renal carcinomas, yet its molecular, cellular, and immune features remain poorly understood. To characterize ccRCC tumors and elucidate factors that contribute to poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, Davidson et al. established a high-resolution ccRCC cell atlas using single-cell RNA sequencing.
    Published August 8, 2023
  • Cost Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma - Beyond the Abstract

    In recent years, several new first-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been approved by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), including five novel immunotherapy-based combinations.1-5 These first-line options are included in current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines based on the patient’s International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category.6,7
    Published April 26, 2023
  • Does Reduced Renal Function Predispose to Cancer-specific Mortality from Renal Cell Carcinoma? - Beyond the Abstract

    The arguments in favor of partial nephrectomy (PN) over radical nephrectomy (RN) for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been diverse and compelling,1 leading many to advocate for PN whenever feasible, even for potentially aggressive tumors.2 However, some patients with tumors with increased oncologic potential and/or high complexity may not be well-served by PN,
    Published June 17, 2021
  • EAU 2019: Post-Nephrectomy Adjuvant Therapy for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: CheckMate 914 Study of Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Patients at High Risk of Relapse

    Barcelona, Spain (UroToday.com) The current standard for advanced localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is nephrectomy. Unfortunately, for better or worse, the series of adjuvant therapy trials in patients with advanced localized RCC with targeted therapies (sutent, sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib) have been either negative – or slightly positive and associated with significant adverse events.
    Published March 19, 2019
  • EAU 2019: The Challenging Landscape in Advanced Renal Cell Cancer Management

    Barcelona, Spain (UroToday.com) Dr. Marc-Oliver Grimm provided an overview of the many changes in the landscape for advanced renal cell carcinoma at the urogenital cancer treatment at a glance session. He started by highlight that the guidelines for advanced kidney cancer have been revamped recently and provided the following two figures based on the: 
    Published March 18, 2019
  • EIKCS 2021: Designing Biomarker-Driven Trials: Opportunities and Challenges

    (UroToday.com) The treatment landscape in the first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has rapidly evolved over the past 3 years. In spite of all these changes, more changes are coming. In a presentation at the European International Kidney Cancer 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting, Dr. Vano discussed biomarker-driven trials.
    Published April 24, 2021
  • EIKCS 2021: Kidney Cancer as a Model for a Curable Neoplasm

    (UroToday.com) The European International Kidney Cancer Symposium 2021 virtual meeting’s keynote lecture was provided by Dr. David McDermott discussing kidney cancer as a model for a curable neoplasm. 

    Published April 24, 2021
  • EIKCS 2021: Modern Therapeutic Approaches in Second-Line and Later Therapies

    (UroToday.com) The treatment landscape in the first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has rapidly evolved over the past 3 years. This proliferation of first-line treatment choices has had meaningful effects on second-line treatment selection.
    Published April 23, 2021
  • EIKCS 2021: Tissue-Based Biomarkers for Potential Clinical Adoption in Renal Cancer

    (UroToday.com) The European International Kidney Cancer Symposium 2021 Virtual Meeting included a systemic therapy session and a presentation by Dr. Thomas Powles discussing tissue-based biomarkers for potential clinical adoption in renal cancer.
    Published April 24, 2021
  • EIKCS 2022: ‘Real World’ Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS) European Annual meeting included an oral abstract session and presentation by Dr. Will Ince discussing the real world impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on survival in metastatic RCC. Real world evidence is important given that few patients are able to enroll in clinical trials, thus assessing these outcomes provides a pragmatic evaluation of utilization across the community. For this study, Dr. Ince and colleagues queried an electronic health record metastatic RCC database at their institution from January 2012 through July 2020, comparing survival among patients that received immune checkpoint inhibitors vs those patients that did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. Key data collected included lines of treatment, survival, age, ECOG status, and IMDC criteria.

    Published April 22, 2022
  • EIKCS 2022: Debate: In Favor of Clinical Considerations and Challenges in Selecting Later-line Therapies

    (UroToday.com) In the sixth session of the 2022 International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS): Europe meeting focusing on later-lines of systemic therapy in advanced kidney cancer, Drs. Camillo Porta and Laurence Albiges debated the approach to second-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Dr. Albiges presented second, emphasizing clinical considerations to guide second line treatment approaches. She suggested that there are at least four main considerations:
    Published April 22, 2022
  • EIKCS 2022: Debate: In Favor of Evidence-based Treatment in the 2nd and 3rd Line

    (UroToday.com) In the sixth session of the 2022 International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS): Europe meeting focusing on later lines of systemic therapy in advanced kidney cancer, Drs. Camillo Porta and Laurence Albiges debated the approach to second-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Dr. Porta presented first, emphasizing evidence-based second line treatment approaches.

    Published April 22, 2022
  • EIKCS 2022: Debate: In Favor of IO/IO

    (UroToday.com) In the fifth session of the 2022 International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS): Europe meeting focusing on first-line systemic therapy in advanced kidney cancer, Dr. Aristotelis Bamias presented the second side of the debate regarding treatment selection, defending the approach of dual immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab and ipilimumab.

    Published April 22, 2022
  • EIKCS 2022: Debate: In Favor of IO/TKI

    (UroToday.com) In the fifth session of the 2022 International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS): Europe meeting focusing on first-line systemic therapy in advanced kidney cancer (metastatic renal cell carcinoma, mRCC), Dr. Pickering presented the first side of a debate regarding treatment selection, defending the approach of immune checkpoint inhibition combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI). In contextualizing this debate, she asked “what we want to achieve in first-line treatment of mRCC?”. She emphasized that we should be seeking to obtain the best outcomes for most patients. To this end, she highlighted “conventional endpoints” including control or shrinkage of cancer, the disappearance of cancer or cure, minimizing symptoms from cancer, minimizing side effects from treatment, and maximizing quality of life. These considerations must be premised on the basis of the fact that we do not have reliable predictive markers to select therapy at an individual level.

    Published April 22, 2022
  • EIKCS 2022: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Cabozantinib for Previously Untreated Advanced RCC: Results from a Discontinued Study Arm of CheckMate 9ER

    (UroToday.com) The 2022 International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS) European Annual meeting included an oral abstract session and presentation by Dr. Bernard Escudier discussing nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which was a discontinued study arm in the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial. Dr. Escudier notes that the CheckMate 9ER trial1 originally included three treatment arms to compare outcomes for nivolumab + cabozantinib versus sunitinib and nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib versus sunitinib. Shortly after CheckMate 9ER began, data from CheckMate 2142 demonstrated the OS superiority of nivolumab + ipilimumab versus sunitinib for patients with IMDC intermediate- or poor-risk untreated advanced RCC, suggesting a likely future role for nivolumab + ipilimumab as standard of care for this population. Based on this evolving advanced RCC treatment landscape, evaluation of nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib versus sunitinib was no longer considered appropriate, and the CheckMate 9ER triplet arm was discontinued early via a protocol amendment.

    Published April 22, 2022
  • Epidemiology and Etiology of Kidney Cancer

    Kidney cancer is a broad, encompassing term that borders on colloquial. While most physicians are referring to renal cell carcinoma when they say “kidney cancer”, a number of other benign and malignant lesions may similarly manifest as a renal mass. Considering only the malignant causes, kidney cancers may include renal cell carcinoma, urothelium-based cancers (including urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma), sarcomas, Wilms tumor, primitive neuroectodermal tumors, carcinoid tumors, hematologic cancers (including lymphoma and leukemia), and secondary cancers (i.e. metastases from other solid organ cancers).

    Epidemiology

    In the United States, cancers of the kidney and renal pelvis comprise the 6th most common newly diagnosed tumors in men and 10th most common in women.1 In 2018, an estimated 65,340 people will be newly diagnosed with cancers of the kidney and renal pelvis in the United States. In men, this comprises 42,680 estimated new cases in 2018 representing 5% of all newly diagnosed cancers. In women, 22,660 new cases are anticipated in 2018 representing 3% of all newly diagnosed cancers. Additionally, 14,970 people are expected to die of kidney and renal pelvis cancers in 2018 in the United States, with this being the 10th most common cause of oncologic death among men.

    In Europe, results are similar. In 2018, the incidence of kidney cancer is estimated at 136,500 new cases representing 3.5% of all new cancer diagnoses.2 This corresponds to an estimated age standardized rate (ASR) of 13.3 cases per 100,000 population. As in the United States, the incidence of kidney and renal pelvis cancers is higher among men (incidence 84,9000, 4.1% of all cancers, ASR 18.6 per 100,000) than women (incidence 51,600, 2.8% of all cancers, ASR 9.0 per 100,000). Correspondingly, 54,700 people were estimated to die of kidney and renal pelvis cancers in Europe in 2018, accounting for 2.8% of all oncologic deaths. The age standardized mortality rate was 4.7 deaths per 100,000 population. Again, death from kidney and renal pelvis cancer was more common among men (mortality 35,100, 3.3% of oncologic deaths, ASR 7.1 per 100,000) than among women (mortality 19,600, 2.3% of oncologic deaths, ASR 2.7 per 100,000). Interestingly, within Europe, there is considerable variation in the incidence and mortality of kidney and renal pelvis cancer between countries.2

    While the aforementioned data have already demonstrated that gender is strongly associated with the risk of both diagnosis of and death from kidney and renal pelvis cancers, age also importantly moderates this risk. Among patients in the United States, the probability of developing kidney and renal pelvis cancer rises nearly ten fold from age <50 to age >70 years.1

    table 1 epidemiology kidney cancer2x
    Thus, kidney cancer is predominantly a disease of older adults, with the typical presentation being between 50 and 70 years of age. However, over time, rates of diagnosis of kidney cancer have increased fastest among patients aged less than 40 years old.3

    In the United States, kidney cancers are more common among African Americans, American Indians, and Alaska Native populations while rates are lower among Asian Americans.4 Worldwide, the highest rates are found in European nations while low rates are seen in African and Asian countries.4

    The vast majority of patients have localized disease at the time of presentation. According to Siegel et al., 65% of all patients diagnosed with kidney and renal pelvis tumors between 2007 and 2013 had localized disease at the time of presentation while 16% had regional spread and 16% had evidence of distant, metastatic disease.1 This is in large part due to incidental diagnosis due to the increased use of ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients presenting with abdominal distress. In fact, 13 to 27% of abdominal imaging studies demonstrate incidental renal lesions unrelated to the reason for the study5 and approximately 80% of these masses are malignant.6 Dr. Welch and colleagues demonstrated elegantly that the use of computed tomography is strongly related to the likelihood of undergoing nephrectomy, likely due to detection of renal masses. Thus, with the increasing utilization of abdominal imaging, the incidence of kidney cancer has increased by approximately 3 to 4% per year since the 1970s.

    Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer. A number of histological subtypes have been recognized including conventional clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma, unclassified RCC, RCC associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions, post-neuroblastoma RCC, and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Conventional ccRCC comprises approximately 70-80% of all RCCs while papillary RCC comprises 10-15%, chromophobe 3-5%, collecting duct carcinoma <1%, unclassified RCC 1-3%, and the remainder are very uncommon.

    Histologically, most of these tumors are believed to arise from the cells of the proximal convoluted tubule given their ultrastructural similarities. Renal medullary carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma, relatively uncommon and aggressive subtypes of RCC, are believed to arise more distally in the nephron.

    Familial RCC Syndromes

    While the vast majority of newly diagnosed RCCs are sporadic, hereditary RCCs account for approximately 4% of all RCCs. Due in large part to the work of Dr. Linehan and others, the understanding of the underlying molecular genetics of RCC have progressed significantly since the early 1990s. These insights have led to a better understanding of both familial and sporadic RCCs.

    Von Hippel-Lindau disease is the most common cause of hereditary RCC. Due to defects in the VHL tumor suppressor gene (located at 3p25-26), this syndrome is characterized by multiple, bilateral clear cell RCCs, retinal angiomas, central nervous system hemangioblastomas, pheochromocytomas, renal and pancreatic cysts, inner ear tumors, and cystadenomas of the epididymis. RCC develops in approximately 50% of individuals with VHL disease. These tumors are characterized by an early age at the time of diagnosis, bilaterality, and multifocality. Due in large part to improved management of the CNS disorders in VHL disease, RCC is the most common cause of death in patients with VHL.

    Hereditary papillary RCC (HPRCC) is, as one would expect from the name, associated with multiple, bilateral papillary RCCs. Due to an underlying constitutive activation of the c-Met proto-oncogene (located at 7q31), these tumors also present at a relatively early age. However, overall, these tumors appear in general to be less aggressive than corresponding sporadic malignancies.

    In contrast, tumors arising in hereditary/familial leiomyomatosis and RCC (HLRCC), due to a defect in the fumarate hydratase (1q42-43) tumor suppressor gene, are typically unilateral, solitary, and aggressive. Histologically, these are typically type 2 papillary RCC, which has a more aggressive phenotype, or collecting duct carcinomas. Extra-renal manifestations include leiomyomas of the skin and uterus and uterine leiomyosarcomas which contribute to the name of this sydrome.

    Birt-Hogg-Dube, due to defect in the tumor suppressor folliculin (17p11), is associated with multiple chromophobe RCCs, hybrid oncocytic tumors (with characteristics of both chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma), oncocytoma. Less commonly, patients with Birt-Hogg-Dube may develop clear cell RCC or papillary RCC. Non-renal manifestations include facial fibrofolliculomas, lung cysts, and the development of spontaneous pneumothorax.

    Tuberous sclerosis, due to defects in TSC1 (located at 9q34) or TSC2 (16p13), may lead to clear cell RCC. More commonly, it is associated with multiple benign renal angiomyolipomas, renal cystic disease, cutaneous angiofibromas, and pulmonary lymphangiomyomatosis.

    Succinate dehydrogenase RCC, due to defects in the SDHB (1p36.1-35) or SDHD (11q23) subunits of the succinate dyhydrogenase complex, may lead to a variety of RCC subtypes including chromophobe RCC, clear cell RCC, and type 2 papillary RCC. Extra-renal manifestations including benign and malignant paragangliomas and papillary thyroid carcinoma. In general, these tumors exhibit aggressive behaviour and wide surgical excision is recommended.

    Finally, Cowden syndrome, due to defects in PTEN (10q23) may lead to papillary or other RCCs in addition to benign and malignant breast tumors and epithelial thyroid cancers.

    Etiologic Risk Factors in Sporadic RCC

    While numerous hereditary RCC syndromes exist, they account for only 4% of all RCCs. However, many sporadic RCCs share similar underlying genetic changes including VHL defects in ccRCC and c-Met activation in papillary RCC. A number of modifiable risk factors associated with RCC have been described.4

    The foremost risk factor for the development of RCC is cigarette smoking. According to both the US Surgeon General and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, observational evidence is sufficient to conclude there is a causal relationship between tobacco smoking and RCC. A comprehensive meta-analysis of western populations demonstrated an overall relative risk for the development of RCC of 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.27 to 1.50) for ever smokers compared to lifetime never smokers.7 Interestingly, this effect was larger for men (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.68) than for women (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36). Additionally, there was a strong dose response relationship: compared to never smokers, men who smoked 1-9 cigarettes per day had a 1.6x risk, those who smoked 10-20 per days had a 1.83x risk, and those who smoked more than 21 per day had a 2.03x risk. A similar trend was seen among women. Notably, the risk of RCC declined with increasing durations of abstinence of smoking. Smoking appears to be preferentially associated with the development of clear cell and papillary RCC.8 In addition to being associated with increased RCC incidence, smoking is associated with more aggressive forms of RCC, manifest with higher pathological stage and an increased propensity for lymph node involvement and metastasis at presentation.9 As a result, smokers have worse cancer-specific and overall survival.9

    Second, obesity is associated with an increased risk of RCC. While this risk was historically felt to be higher among women, a more recent review demonstrated no such effect modification according to sex.10 In a meta-analysis of 22 studies, Bergstrom et al. estimated that each unit increase of BMI was associated with a 7% increase in the relative risk of RCC diagnosis.

    Third, hypertension has been associated with an increased risk of RCC diagnosis, with a hazard ratio of 1.70 (95%CI 1.30-2.22) in the VITAL study.11 Interestingly, in an American multiethnic cohort, this effect appeared to be larger among women (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.28) than in men (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.87).12 Again, as with obesity, there appears to be a dose-effect relationship between severity of hypertension and the risk of RCC diagnosis.13

    Fourth, acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) appears to be associated with a nearly 50x increase risk of RCC diagnosis.14 ACKD occurs in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. These changes are common among patients who have been on dialysis for at least 3 years.14 Interestingly, the risk of RCC appears to decrease following renal transplantation.

    Finally, a number of other putative risk factors have been described. These lack the voracity of data that the aforementioned four have. Such risk factors include alcohol, analgesics, diabetes, and diet habits.4

    Published Date: November 20th, 2018

    References:

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2018;68:7-30.

    2. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. European journal of cancer 2018.

    3. Nepple KG, Yang L, Grubb RL, 3rd, Strope SA. Population based analysis of the increasing incidence of kidney cancer in the United States: evaluation of age specific trends from 1975 to 2006. The Journal of urology 2012;187:32-8.

    4. Kabaria R, Klaassen Z, Terris MK. Renal cell carcinoma: links and risks. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2016;9:45-52.

    5. Gill IS, Aron M, Gervais DA, Jewett MA. Clinical practice. Small renal mass. The New England journal of medicine 2010;362:624-34.

    6. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. The Journal of urology 2003;170:2217-20.

    7. Hunt JD, van der Hel OL, McMillan GP, Boffetta P, Brennan P. Renal cell carcinoma in relation to cigarette smoking: meta-analysis of 24 studies. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer 2005;114:101-8.

    8. Patel NH, Attwood KM, Hanzly M, et al. Comparative Analysis of Smoking as a Risk Factor among Renal Cell Carcinoma Histological Subtypes. The Journal of urology 2015;194:640-6.

    9. Kroeger N, Klatte T, Birkhauser FD, et al. Smoking negatively impacts renal cell carcinoma overall and cancer-specific survival. Cancer 2012;118:1795-802.

    10. Bergstrom A, Hsieh CC, Lindblad P, Lu CM, Cook NR, Wolk A. Obesity and renal cell cancer--a quantitative review. British journal of cancer 2001;85:984-90.

    11. Macleod LC, Hotaling JM, Wright JL, et al. Risk factors for renal cell carcinoma in the VITAL study. The Journal of urology 2013;190:1657-61.

    12. Setiawan VW, Stram DO, Nomura AM, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE. Risk factors for renal cell cancer: the multiethnic cohort. American journal of epidemiology 2007;166:932-40

    13. Vatten LJ, Trichopoulos D, Holmen J, Nilsen TI. Blood pressure and renal cancer risk: the HUNT Study in Norway. British journal of cancer 2007;97:112-4.

    14. Brennan JF, Stilmant MM, Babayan RK, Siroky MB. Acquired renal cystic disease: implications for the urologist. Br J Urol 1991;67:342-8.

    Published November 20, 2018
  • ESMO 2018: Safety and Tolerability of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab vs Sunitinib in Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: IMmotion 150 and IMmotion 151

    Munich, Germany (UroToday.com) IMmotion 150 (Phase II) compared the efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) plus bevacizumab (bev) with atezolizumab alone and sunitinib alone and then allowed for crossover in the latter 2 arms to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.1 IMmotion 151  (Phase III) compared the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib for first-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma2.
    Published October 22, 2018

Page 1 of 3