Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options - Abstract

PURPOSE: Approximately 90 million American adults have literacy skills that test below a high school reading level. Websites written above this level can pose a challenge for those seeking online information about prostate cancer treatment options.

In this study we determine the readability of selected websites using a systematic search process and validated readability formulas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified the 3 most popular keywords from 513 terms related to prostate cancer treatment options. We then systematically collected 270 websites from the top 3 search engines, and excluded from study those that were nonEnglish, not primarily text, irrelevant and/or duplicated. We used the Flesch-Kincaid grade level and Flesch Reading Ease to determine scores for each site.

RESULTS: A total of 62 unique websites were analyzed. Median Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 12.0 (range 8.0 to 12.0) and median Flesch Reading Ease score was 38.1 (range 0.0 to 65.5). Only 3 sites (4.8%) were written below a high school reading level (less than 9.0).

CONCLUSIONS: Few websites with discussions on prostate cancer treatment options are written below a high school reading level. This is problematic for a third of Americans who seek to further educate themselves using online resources. Clinicians can use this information to guide their patients to appropriate websites.

Written by:
Ellimoottil C, Polcari A, Kadlec A, Gupta G.   Are you the author?
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.

Reference: J Urol. 2012 Oct 17. pii: S0022-5347(12)04411-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.105


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23083852

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section