ASCO 2021: Phase II Study of Nivolumab and Salvage Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Treatment-Naïve Patients (Pts) with Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC) (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B)

(UroToday.com) While there have been transformational changes in first-line therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the past three years, these studies have focused on patients with clear cell histology. As a result, there have been little direct data to guide care for patients with non-clear cell histologies and we have had to rely primarily on extrapolation from data derived among patients with clear cell disease. As such, sunitinib has remained the NCCN guideline-recommended first-line treatment. The HCRN GU16-260 cohort A assessed the efficacy and safety of an initial nivolumab monotherapy followed by nivolumab and ipilimumab salvage approach in patients with treatment naïve clear cell RCC. In the Kidney and Bladder Poster Discussion session at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, Dr. Michael Akins presented results of a phase II trial of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) (NCT03117309).

The authors enrolled patients with treatment-naïve nccRCC and treated them with nivolumab 240mg IV every 2 weeks for 6 doses followed by 360mg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by 480 mg every 4 weeks until progressive disease (PD), toxicity, or completion of 96 weeks of treatment (Part A; n=16). Patients who had progressive disease or who, at 48 weeks, had stable disease, were potentially eligible to receive salvage nivolumab (3mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by nivolumab maintenance every 4 weeks for up to 48 weeks (Part B; n=19). Biopsy of a metastatic lesion obtained within 12 months prior to study entry and prior to enrolling on Part B was used for correlative studies.

ASCO21_Atkins_Figure1.png
Thirty-five patients with nccRCC were enrolled between May 2017 and December 2019 across 12 different participating HCRN sites. The median age of enrolled patients was 63 years (range 35-84 years) and 89%, male. In terms of disease risk characteristics, 8 (23%) patients had favorable, 18 (51%) intermediate, and 9 (26%) poor-risk disease per IMDC criteria. In terms of histology, 19 (54%) patients had papillary RCC, 6 (17%) had chromophobe RCC, and 10 (29%) had unclassified histology.

In terms of treatment response, RECIST defined ORR was seen in 5 of 35 patients (14.3%) with a complete response (CR) in 2 (5.7%) and a partial response (PR) in 3 (8.6%). Stable disease was seen in 16 (45.7%) patients while 14 (40.0%) had progressive disease. Immune-related ORR was 8 of 35 (22.9%).

ASCO21_Atkins_Figure2.png
The authors then assessed RECIST ORR according to histology. In those with papillary RCC, the response rate was 1/19 (5%) while for those with chromophobe, ORR was 1/6 (17%) and it was 3/10 (30%) in those with unclassified RCC. Among 9 patients (26%) with tumors with sarcomatoid features, 3 (33%) responded (2 unclassified, 1 papillary).  Further, ORR by PD-L1 status showed an ORR of 33% in those with 5-20% PD-L1 expression and 25% in those with >20% PD-L1 expression.

The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI 2.8- 4.3). At the time of reporting, 21 of 35 patients remained alive and none of the responders had progressed or died.

ASCO21_Atkins_Figure3.png

Among the 30 patients with progressive disease and 3 with stable disease at 48 weeks who were potentially eligible for salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab (Part B), 13 did not enroll due to symptomatic progressive disease (6), grade 3-4 nivolumab-related toxicity (3), or other reasons (4). Among the 17 patients who enrolled for salvage therapy on Part B, the best response to nivolumab and ipilimumab was a partial response in 1 patient (6%) (unclassified/non-sarcomatoid), stable disease in 7 patients (44%), and progressive disease in 8 patients (50%). The median PFS in this cohort was 2.8 months.

Grade 3 Treatment-related adverse events were identified in 7 of 35 patients (20%) while on nivolumab monotherapy while grade 3-5 events were seen in 7 of 17 patients (41%) while receiving salvage nivolumab and ipilimumab, with one experiencing sudden death. Ongoing work will assess correlative studies including PD-L1 status, WES, and RNAseq.

The authors conclude that nivolumab monotherapy has limited activity in treatment naïve nccRCC. Among those who responded, most patients had sarcomatoid and/or unclassified tumors. Patients with low levels of PD-L1 expression did not have responses. Salvage treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab could be given in just over half of eligible patients but had limited ability to salvage non-responders. Thus, other treatment approaches are needed.

Presented By: Michael B. Atkins, MD, Deputy Director of the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Scholl Professor and vice-chair of the Department of Medical Oncology at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washinton, DC

Written By: Christopher J.D. Wallis, MD, Ph.D., Urologic Oncology Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Contact: @WallisCJD on Twitter at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Virtual Annual Meeting #ASCO21, June, 4-8, 2021