APCCC 2019 PRESENTATION SLIDES

Get Free Access to Session Slides

APCCC 2019: De Novo Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Consensus and Controversy on Aims, Options and Rationale

Basel, Switzerland (UroToday.com) Michael Morris, MD, discussed de novo oligometastatic prostate cancer at the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 session on PSA recurrence after radical local therapy and oligometastatic prostate cancer. According to Dr. Morris, de novo oligometastatic disease represents a unique treatment opportunity, such that it is an untreated primary, an untreated metastatic disease with limited distribution. Prolonging overall survival (OS) or achieving a cure is probably most feasible when attempted early before lethal treatment-related biology emerges.

We currently have level 1 evidence that AR-directed therapy improves OS in M1 disease, provided by mutually supportive, well-conducted phase III randomized prospective trials:

  • STAMPEDE1: M0 or M1 patients treated with ADT vs ADT + abiraterone acetate and prednisone (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.76).
  • LATITUDE2: M1, high risk patients treated with ADT vs ADT + abiraterone acetate and prednisone (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.76).
  • ENZAMET3: M1 patients (all comers) treated with ADT vs ADT + enzalutamide (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86).
  • TITAN4: M1 patients (all comers) treated with ADT vs ADT + apalutamide (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.89).
However, there are mixed data regarding docetaxel with regards to oligometastatic disease, a subset of “low-volume/low-risk” disease:

Morris_APCCC19_0.png

According to Dr. Morris, the primary may be an active participant in tumor self-seeding as well as generating metastatic disease. Whole-genome sequencing has shown cross-pollination of metastatic disease in mCRPC in that metastatic lesions were often more similar to each other than the primary. Furthermore, similar metastatic lesions were often in geographic proximity, a phenomenon known as interclonal cooperativity.5

The STAMPEDE arm H radiation therapy to the primary lesion6 was built on the HORRAD data, randomizing patients to standard of care +/- radiation therapy to the primary. Importantly, the study was powered to assess low volume disease independent of the larger treatment group. This study found that among 819 low volume patients, radiation therapy to the primary improved OS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90). Confirmatory studies of this finding are currently underway and include PEACE-1, SWOG 1802, TRoMbone, and G-RAMPP.

Small studies have assessed metastasis directed therapy vs no therapy, including a Japanese study of 40 patients with bone metastasis and node positive prostate cancer.7 Among these patients, 18 received metastasis-directed radiation therapy to all metastatic sites. Oligometastatic disease was defined as the presence of five or fewer metastatic lesions. Over a median follow-up of 62.5 months among all patients, the 5-year castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival rate and cancer-specific survival was 64.4% and 87.9%, respectively. Patients treated with metastasis-directed radiation therapy had a significantly higher probability of achieving a PSA level of <0.02 ng/mL than those without the therapy (88.8% vs 54.5%, p = 0.035) and consequently had a better CRPC-free survival than those without the therapy (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.12-0.88).

Currently, there are ongoing trials of radiation therapy to metastatic sites and treating the primary with systemic therapy, including STAMPEDE arm M:

Morris_APCCC19_1.png

Dr. Morris concluded his presentation with several summary points:

  • There is a subset of M1 patients with the primary still in place.
  • There is no justification for denying these patients systemic therapy – we have level 1 data, which has been confirmed many times over. However, the duration of therapy remains an open question.
  • The rationale and data support radiation therapy to the primary lesion, and confirmatory studies are needed and underway.
  • Radiation to the metastatic lesions are anecdotal and not standard of care, as there is currently no prospective data. Furthermore, we need real endpoints that we can interpret.

Presented by: Michael J. Morris, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA 

Written by: Zachary Klaassen, MD, MSc, Assistant Professor of Urology, Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University/Medical College of Georgia, Twitter: @zklaassen_md, at the 2019 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) #APCCC19, Aug 29 - 31, 2019 in Basel, Switzerland

References:
  1. James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for Prostate Cancer Not Previously Treated with Hormone Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):338-351.
  2. Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone plus Prednisone in Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):352-360.
  3. Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, et al. Enzalutamide with Standard First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019 Jul 11;381(2):121-131.
  4. Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2019 Jul 4;381(1):13-24.
  5. Gundem, G, Van Loo P, Kremeyer B, et al. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature 2015 Apr 16;520(7547):353-357.
  6. Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): A randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-2366
  7. Tsumura H, Ishiyama H, Tabata KI, et al. Long-term outcomes of combining prostate brachytherapy and metastasis-directed radiotherapy in newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Prostate 2019 Apr;79(5):506-514.

Further Related Content: De-Novo Oligometastatic Disease: Censensus and Controversy on Aims, Options, and Rationale Presentation
email news signup