Validation of Prognostic and Predictive Models for Therapeutic Response in Patients Treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Versus Cabazitaxel for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (TheraP): A Post Hoc Analysis from a Randomised, Open-label, Phase 2

Prognostic models have been developed using data from a multicentre noncomparative study to forecast the likelihood of a 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA50), longer prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS), and longer overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. The predictive utility of the models to identify patients likely to benefit most from [177Lu]Lu-PSMA compared with standard chemotherapy has not been established.

To determine the predictive value of the models using data from the randomised, open-label, phase 2, TheraP trial (primary objective) and to evaluate the clinical net benefit of the PSA50 model (secondary objective).

All 200 patients were randomised in the TheraP trial to receive [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n = 99) or cabazitaxel (n = 101) between February 2018 and September 2019.

Predictive performance was investigated by testing whether the association between the modelled outcome classifications (favourable vs unfavourable outcome) was different for patients randomised to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA versus cabazitaxel. The clinical benefit of the PSA50 model was evaluated using a decision curve analysis.

The probability of PSA50 in patients classified as having a favourable outcome was greater in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group than in the cabazitaxel group (odds ratio 6.36 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.69-30.80] vs 0.96 [95% CI 0.32-3.05]; p = 0.038 for treatment-by-model interaction). The PSA50 rate in patients with a favourable outcome for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel was 62/88 (70%) versus 31/85 (36%). The decision curve analysis indicated that the use of the PSA50 model had a clinical net benefit when the probability of a PSA response was ≥30%. The predictive performance of the models for PSA PFS and OS was not established (treatment-by-model interaction: p = 0.36 and p = 0.41, respectively).

A previously developed outcome classification model for PSA50 was demonstrated to be both predictive and prognostic for the outcome after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel, while the PSA PFS and OS models had purely prognostic value. The models may aid clinicians in defining strategies for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed first-line chemotherapy and are eligible for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and cabazitaxel.

In this report, we validated previously developed statistical models that can predict a response to Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We found that the statistical models can predict patient survival, and aid in determining whether Lu-PSMA therapy or cabazitaxel yields a higher probability to achieve a serum prostate-specific antigen response.

European urology oncology. 2024 Apr 06 [Epub ahead of print]

Andrei Gafita, Andrew J Martin, Louise Emmett, Matthias Eiber, Amir Iravani, Wolfgang P Fendler, James Buteau, Shahneen Sandhu, Arun A Azad, Ken Herrmann, Martin R Stockler, Ian D Davis, Michael S Hofman

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Theranostics Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: ., NHMRC Clinical Trials Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia., ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia., Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany., ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Center of Excellence (ProsTIC), Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA., Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany., ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Center of Excellence (ProsTIC), Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia., ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia., ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.