Quality Metric to Assess Adequacy of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer Placement for Prostate Radiation Therapy and Association of Metric Score With Rectal Toxicity Outcomes.

Although hydrogel spacer placement (HSP) minimizes rectal dose during prostate cancer radiation therapy, its potential benefit for modulating rectal toxicity could depend on the achieved prostate-rectal separation. We therefore developed a quality metric associated with rectal dose reduction and late rectal toxicity among patients treated with prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

A quality metric consisting of prostate-rectal interspace measurements from axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging simulation images was applied to 42 men enrolled in a multi-institutional phase 2 study using HSP with prostate SBRT (45 Gy in 5 fractions). A score of 0, 1, or 2 was assigned to a prostate-rectal interspace measurement of <0.3 cm, 0.3 to 0.9 cm, or ≥1 cm, respectively. An overall spacer quality score (SQS) was computed from individual scores at rectal midline and ±1 cm laterally, located at the prostate base, midgland, and apex. Associations of SQS with rectal dosimetry and late toxicity were evaluated.

The majority of the analyzed cohort had an SQS of 1 (n = 17; 41%) or 2 (n = 18; 43%). SQS was associated with maximum rectal point dose (rectal Dmax; P = .002), maximum dose to 1 cc of rectum (D1cc; P = .004), and volume of rectum receiving ≥100% of prescription dose (V45; P = .046) and ≥40 Gy (V40; P = .005). SQS was also associated with a higher incidence of (P = .01) and highest-graded late rectal toxicity (P = .01). Among the 20 men who developed late grade ≥1 rectal toxicity, 57%, 71%, and 22% had an SQS of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Men with an SQS of 0 or 1 compared with 2 had 4.67-fold (95% CI, 0.72-30.11) or 8.40-fold (95% CI, 1.83-38.57) greater odds, respectively, of developing late rectal toxicity.

We developed a reliable and informative metric for assessing HSP, which appears to be associated with rectal dosimetry and late rectal toxicity after prostate SBRT.

Advances in radiation oncology. 2023 Jan 24*** epublish ***

Craig E Grossman, Michael R Folkert, Stephanie Lobaugh, Neil B Desai, Marisa A Kollmeier, Daniel Gorovets, Sean M McBride, Robert D Timmerman, Zhigang Zhang, Michael J Zelefsky

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York., Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York., Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.