Several studies were conducted to explore the association between haematological parameters and erectile dysfunction (ED), but the conclusions were contradictory with small sample size. The extensively search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of science from inception to August 2021. Studies comparing the haematological parameter (at least NLR, PLR) between ED patients and healthy controls were eligible for the present meta-analysis. The differences in NLR and PLR between ED patients and healthy controls were assessed by calculating the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Eventually, 7 studies were remained for our meta-analysis, with a total of 929 ED patients and 737 healthy controls. For the methodological quality based on NOS, 5 studies were of high quality, scored 7, and 8. 2 studies were of moderate quality, scored 6. There were statistically significant differences in NLR values between ED patients and healthy controls, based on the pooled results (SMD: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.24-0.82). Pooled results from the 6 studies revealed that ED patients had higher PLR values than healthy controls (SMD: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.12-1.28). Our meta-analysis solidly confirmed the association between NLR, PLR and ED. Increased NLR and PLR should be independent risk factors for ED.
Andrologia. 2021 Dec 08 [Epub ahead of print]
Yuyang Zhang, Xingliang Feng, Xu Wu, Wei Zhang, Yutian Dai, Hui Jiang, Xiansheng Zhang
Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China., Department of Surgical Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China., Department of Andrology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China., The Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.