Reasons for missing clinically significant prostate cancer by targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy.

This study evaluates cases with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) missed by targeted biopsy (TB) and analyzes the diagnostic impact of an additional systematic biopsy (SB) in a large patient collective.

Consecutive patients with a 3 T multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) and a subsequent MRI/US fusion-guided TB plus 12-core US-guided SB from 01/2014 to 04/2019 were included in this study. Primary study endpoint was the analysis of cases with a csPCa missed by TB and detected by SB. Secondary study objectives were the PCa detection and the correlation with clinical and MRI parameters.

In total 785 patients met the inclusion criteria. 342 patients had a csPCa (median PSAD 0.29 ng/mL/cm3). In 42 patients (13 %), a csPCa was detected only by SB. In 36 of these cases, the localization of the positive SB cores matched with the cancer suspicious region described on mpMRI (mCSR). Cases with a csPCA missed by TB showed either an insufficient MRI segmentation (prostate boundary correlation) (31 %) and/or insufficient lesion registration (lesion transfer, tracking, and/or matching) (48 %), a missed small lesion (14 %), or a failed center of a large lesion (10 %). Median PSAD of patients with non-significant PCa detected by SB was 0.15 ng/mL/cm3.

Main reasons for missing a csPCa by TB were insufficient prostate segmentation or imprecise lesion registration within MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy. Consequently, verification of MRI quality, exact mCSR assessment, and advanced biopsy experience may improve accuracy. Altogether, an additional SB adds limited clinical benefit in men with PSAD ≤ 0.15 ng/mL/cm3.

European journal of radiology. 2021 Feb 10 [Epub ahead of print]

M Klingebiel, C Arsov, T Ullrich, M Quentin, R Al-Monajjed, D Mally, L M Sawicki, A Hiester, I Esposito, P Albers, G Antoch, L Schimmöller

University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Pathology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: ., University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: .