ASCO GU 2023: Evaluation of a Novel Transcriptomic Tumor Signature (PROSTest) as Response Biomarker for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer

(UroToday.com) On the first day of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancer Symposium 2023 focussing on prostate cancer, Dr. Alin Chirindel presented in Poster Session A on the evaluation of a novel biomarker for response to lutetium-177 PSMA (Lu-PSMA) advanced prostate cancer.


Based on a number of prospective trials, radionuclide therapy targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA therapy) has proven to be an effective treatment in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPCs). Despite representing a significant therapeutic breakthrough, there remains a critical unmet need in 177Lu-PSMA therapy to identify a prognostic biomarker for treatment optimization given that conventional imaging and standard biomarkers have limited value. The PROSTest is a new 27-gene algorithmic signature originally developed for prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosis (0 to 100, positive score ≥20). We hypothesized that PROSTest would be elevated in patients with mCRPC and could have utility as a biomarker for mCRPC management.

The authors prospectively enrolled 113 men with mCRPC to receive 177Lu-PSMA therapy (KlbB-5338-0302021 study). The authors acquired pathology, clinical and biomarker data, and PSMA-PET/CT imaging data. Prior to the start of therapy, blood samples were collected for PROSTest. Using these samples, target genes were isolated and amplified using qPCR. PROSTest scores (0-100) were obtained following algorithmic analysis. Scores were correlated with mCRPC diagnosis and baseline information. Scores and standard clinical measures were evaluated as prognostic factors with survival as endpoint. Mann-Whitney U-test, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were utilized. All data: median (IQ range).

image-0.jpg 

Among the 113 enrolled men, 89 (79%) patients were evaluable. The median age was 75 (68-80) years. In terms of disease characteristics at time of diagnosis, 70% of patients had Gleason scores 8-10 disease. In terms of staging, 67% of patients had T4 tumors, 53% had N1 disease and, 45% were M1 at diagnosis. At the time of therapy all patients were metastatic and all exhibited PSMA-positive disease. The highest tumor SUVmax was 51 (28-78). PSA levels were 69ng/mL (18-305). The PROSTest score was 89 (81-92). PROSTest scores were weakly correlated with age (r=0.33, p=0.0015) but not with baseline histopathological parameters (e.g., Gleason score, TNM) or pretreatment imaging results (e.g., SUVmax). During follow-up, 24 of 89 patients (27%) patients died.

Currently, treatment and follow-up are ongoing with a median follow-up to date of 5 months (range 3 to 18 months). The mOS is 15 months.

The authors found that only the PROSTest score was associated with mortality: PROSTest scores ≥79 (based on ROC analysis) were associated with significantly increased risk for mortality (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.5-7.4). The mOS was 14 months in patients with pre-therapy PROSTest scores >79 compared to mOS not reached for PROSTest scores <79 (p=0.02). In the COX model, baseline PROSTest was found to to be significantly predictive of death (p=0.01).

Thus, the authors conclude that the PROSTest blood gene expression score is elevated in mCRPCs, though levels are not associated with baseline clinical, histopathological, pretreatment PSA or imaging parameters. Elevated expression (≥79) of this biomarker prior to treatment was associated with a lower survival and could be used to predict survival in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA.

Presented by: Alin Chirindel, MD, University Hospital Basel