ASCO GU 2021: Impact of Subsequent Therapy on Survival in KEYNOTE-361: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) plus Chemotherapy (Chemo) or Pembro Alone Versus Chemo as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

(UroToday.com) Platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) based on improved survival compared to placebo. However, objective response rates are at best 50% and median overall survival is relatively poor at less than 18 months. As a result, there have been numerous efforts to improve these outcomes. One such attempt was to add immune checkpoint inhibition to chemotherapy. This approach was used in the phase III KEYNOTE-361 study which compared first-line pembrolizumab + chemotherapy or pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with advanced UC.




ASCO_GU_keynote361.png

Unfortunately, as previously reported, the trial did not meet its primary endpoints, failing to demonstrate a benefit of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone based on progression-free or overall survival, though formal testing of overall survival for pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy was not performed. In a poster presentation at the 2021 ASCO GU Cancers Symposium, Dr. Ajjai Shivaram Alva and colleagues present an exploratory analysis of OS by subsequent therapy among patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-361 to assess how first and second-line therapy selection affected survival.

To do so, the authors examined overall survival, stratified by whether patients received subsequent therapy and by whether this therapy included an anti–PD-(L)1 agent.

Utilizing the KEYNOTE-361 cohort, the authors examined 351 patients randomized to pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, 307 patients to pembrolizumab alone, and 352 patients to chemotherapy alone with a median time from randomization to data cut-off of 32 months (22-42 months).

With a data cut-off of April 29, 2020, subsequent therapy was administered to 124 patients (35%) in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy arm, 126 patients (41%) in the pembrolizumab alone arm, and 215 patients (61%) in the chemotherapy alone arm. Rates were similar among patients who experienced progressive disease according to blinded independent central review: 32% among those in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy arm, 43% in the pembrolizumab alone arm, and 59% in the chemotherapy alone arm.

ASCO_GU_pembrolizumab.png

As may be expected, use of subsequent anti–PD-(L)1 therapy was higher among patients who initially received chemotherapy alone (48%) as compared to those in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy arm (7%) or the pembrolizumab arm (5%). The authors then excluded patients in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy arm and the pembrolizumab arm who received subsequent anti−PD-(L)1 therapy.

In total, the authors identified 465 patients (46%) who received second-line therapy. Among patients who did not receive anti−PD-(L)1 therapy in this setting, single-agent or combination chemotherapy was most commonly used including carboplatin, cisplatin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel.

Patients who initially received chemotherapy followed by second-line immunotherapy have longer overall survival (median 19 months) than those who received first-line pembrolizumab followed by a non-IO second-line approach (median 16 months).

ASCO_GU_docetaxel.png

In conclusion, the authors find that this exploratory analysis suggests that the sequence of initial chemotherapy followed by anti–PD-(L)1 agent may optimize outcomes and emphasizes the role of second-line immunotherapy.

Presented by: Ajjai Shivaram Alva, MBBS, MD Associate Professor of Medicine and a Medical Oncologist at the University of Michigan Medicine Urology Oncology Clinic, Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Written by: Christopher J.D. Wallis, Urologic Oncology Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Contact: @WallisCJD on Twitter during the 2021 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium (ASCO GU), February 11th to 13th, 2021


Related Content:

The Final Results of KEYNOTE-361 - Ajjai Alva