ASCO 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

ASCO 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

INTERVIEW WITH EVAN YU
Management of mCRPC using Sipuleucel-T

VIEW ALL mCRPC VIDEOS

ASCO 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

ASCO 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

INTERVIEW WITH JACOB BERCHUCK & MARY-ELLEN TAPLIN
Genetic Risk in Prostate Cancer

VIEW ALL PROSTATE CANCER VIDEOS

ASCO 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

ASCO 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

INTERVIEW WITH KARIM FIZAZI
ARAMIS Trial in Prostate Cancer: Impact of Darolutamide on Pain and Quality of Life

VIEW ALL nmCRPC VIDEOS

EAU 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

EAU 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

INTERVIEW WITH THOMAS POWLES
Immunotherapy in the Peri-Operative Setting for Bladder Cancer

VIEW ALL BLADDER CANCER VIDEOS

Videos
State-of-the-industry video lectures by leading urology experts
Featured Videos

#AUA14 - The number of systematic biopsy cores raises predominantly the detection of insignificant cancer - Session Highlights

ORLANDO, FL USA (UroToday.com) - There are three systematic biopsy approaches for prostate biopsies: transrectal, parallel needle transperineal, and angled needle transperineal. The detection of significant and insignificant prostate cancer is important in clinical practice. Doyoung Chang and colleagues evaluated and compared the best probability of detection of the 3 methods using different numbers of cores.

auaThe researchers used the Visible Human Project (National Library of Medicine) to simulate transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Using Amira Visualization platform, manual segmentation of the whole pelvic structures was performed. The probability of detection for multiple cores was defined as the ratio of the combined volume of individual sampled volumes to the total prostate volume. The authors then compared the maximum probability of detection for different cores and for the mentioned 3-biopsy approaches.

More core sampling led to higher probability of detection of significant tumors if the cores remained the same. The probability of detection was higher when transrectal or angled needle transperineal biopsy was employed. The ratio of significant to insignificant probability of detection decreased as more cores were used.

The authors concluded that cancer probability of detection increases for both large and small lesions. Thus, the increased number of cores leads to prostate cancer over detection. Increased detection of prostate cancer may not be useful in patients who have multiple comorbidities given their chances of death from other causes. Thus, implementation of this technique in a clinical setting may benefit patients who are younger and have fewer comorbidies.

Presented by Doyoung Chang at the American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting - May 16 - 21, 2014 - Orlando, Florida USA

Baltimore, MD USA

Written by Garen Abedi, MD, University of California (Irvine), and medical writer for UroToday.com

 

Conference Coverage
 
Recent data from conferences worldwide
Journals
Publications focusing on urologic cancer treatments through original manuscripts
Everyday Urology Volume 4 Issue 1

Everyday Urology™ - Oncology Insights

PCAN cover

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

From the Editor

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe