WCE 2011 - A prospective study examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection post-shockwave lithotripsy - Session Highlights

KYOTO, JAPAN (UroToday.com) -

Who needs a urine culture prior to SWL? Answer: Everyone

Who should have a urinalysis prior to SWL? Answer: Likely nobody
Who needs antibiotic prophylaxis prior to SWL? Answer: Hardly anyone.

 

In this provocative prospective study of 526 patients slated to undergo SWL, the authors noted that urine dipstick analysis picked up only 13% of the positive urine cultures (i.e. nitrite and leucocyte positive); hence the recommendation that prior to SWL all patients should have a urine culture and have directed antibiotic therapy if the culture is positive. On the other hand, among patients with a negative urine culture, regardless of the presence of an indwelling stent, preventative antibiotics should NOT be administered. Indeed, in this study only 1 patient (0.2%) who did not receive antibiotics developed a urinary tract infection.

One could make the case for deleting the urinalysis ($19 per test) and avoiding the use of prophylactic antibiotics ($18 for three tablets of Cipro in the United States), thereby reducing cost per SWL by $37/patient and also eliminating the side effects and selection of resistant bacteria from overuse of ciprofloxacin. A policy of this nature would have saved nearly $20,000 in this patient cohort.


 

Presented by Kirsten Foell at the 29th World Congress of Endourology & SWL (WCE) - November 30 - December 3, 2011 - Kyoto International Conference Center - Kyoto, Japan


Reported for UroToday by Ralph V. Clayman, MD, Chair, Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA


 

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the UroToday.com Contributing Medical Editor and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of the Endourological Society.


 



 

 



View Full WCE 2011 Meeting Coverage

 

email news signup