The Challenge of Difficult Catheterization in Men: A Novel Technique and Review of the Literature

 

ABSTRACT

Male urethral catheterization can be difficult and is still a familiar problem for urologists. A laborious male urethral catheterization is often consequent to the presence of a bulky prostate due to benign prostatic enlargement, a condition intimately related to aging with an increasing prevalence in elderly people. The task of passing a urethral catheter in this atypical condition often leads to repeated and unsuccessful attempts, which can cause the patient distress, and are often related to a wide range of complications, sometimes leading to medico-legal lawsuits.

We describe a simple and safe technique only requiring equipment readily available in every urology department. It facilitates the chances of an atraumatic and successful catheter insertion in men suffering from different pathologic or anatomic conditions when a primary attempt of simple transurethral catheterization fails.

The performance of the technique was tested in 76 patients who required bladder catheterization by a urologic consultant because of failed primary attempts. Difficulties were attributable to past transurethral resection of the prostate in 10 patients, past open radical retropubic prostatectomy in 7, and benign prostate enlargement in 59. Successful catheterization was obtained in 65 patients, 5 patients were otherwise catheterized by a rigid catheter, and 6 required a suprapubic catheter or flexible cystoscopy. Complications comprised self-limiting urethral bleeding in 12 patients, urinary tract infection in 4, and false passage in 2.

The technique is well tolerated and increases the likelihood of successful primary urethral catheterization in this set of patients; moreover, a hospital admission that is needed in case of placing a suprapubic catheter is not required.


Mario Gardi, Giulio Massimo Balta, Marcello Repele, Nicola Zanovello, Giovanni Betto, Simonetta Fracalanza, Wanni Battanello, Bruno Santoni, Silvia Secco, Andrea Agostini, Massimo Dal Bianco

Submitted June 1, 2013 - Accepted for Publication July 31, 2013


KEYWORDS: Difficult catheterization, bulky prostate, prostate enlargement, complication, malpractice

CORRESPONDENCE: Mario Gardi, MD, PhD, Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, Ospedale Sant’Antonio, Building G, Via Facciolati, 71, Padova, Italy ()

CITATION: UroToday Int J. 2013 August;6(4):art 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2013.08.12

uijpurchasebutton

INTRODUCTION

Male bladder transurethral catheterization can be difficult and is still a familiar problem for urologists. It can be a challenge involving a urethral stricture, false passages as a result of previous unfruitful attempts at catheterization, prostate cancer, bladder neck contractures following transurethral resection of the prostate, and obliterated anastomosis following a radical prostatectomy. More often a laborious catheterization may be due to a bulky prostate in case of benign prostatic enlargement, a condition intimately related to aging with an increased prevalence in elderly people [1].

The task of passing a urethral catheter in this atypical condition often falls to the more junior and inexperienced members of staff, and may represent a potential cause for a lawsuit [2]. Repeated, rough, and unsuccessful attempts can cause the patient distress and are often related to a wide range of complications, such as urethral damage, including significant bleeding (e.g., in men assuming oral anticoagulants) and the late onset of urethral strictures [3], and more serious morbid conditions such as sepsis, rectal perforation, and Fournier's gangrene. We describe a simple and safe technique that facilitates the chances of atraumatic and successful catheter insertion in men suffering of sub-stenotic vesicourethral anastomosis, bladder neck contractures following transurethral resection of the prostate, or bulky prostate due to benign prostatic enlargement or cancer.

METHODS

When catheter placement is required to resolve acute retention or for clinical monitoring, the first step is to focalize on past medical history and physical examination. It's important to know whether a patient underwent prior urological surgeries (such as radical prostatectomy or urethroplasty), endoscopic procedures (such as transurethral prostate resection or cystoscopy), previous urethral stenosis or voiding dysfunctions, assuming medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer, or reported difficult catheterization in the past. To the same extent, information deriving from previous attempts at catheterization are important. This includes the type and size of the catheter used, the level of a perceived stop during catheter advancement, inflation of the catheter balloon, possible pain by the patient indicating urethral trauma due to expansion of the balloon elsewhere than the bladder, urethral bleeding, the number of attempts at catheterization, and personnel involved (nurses, general practitioner) [3]. Physical examination can show signs of urethral trauma (blood at the meatus) or possible causes of difficult catheterization such as anasarca, phimosis, micro penis, meatal stenosis, penile oedema, prostate cancer, or prostate enlargement. To manage all these possible scenarios, we adopted an internal flow chart to allow the discrimination between different underlying conditions, suggesting different possible solutions for vesical catheterization (Figure 1).

Catheterization is an aseptic skill that requires appropriate training and material. The present technique only requires equipment readily available in every urology department. Aside from the normal material used in a classical catheterization procedure, our technique in particular involves the use of a common Foley catheter (16 Fr) in flexible latex supplied with an autostatic inflatable balloon at the internal tip. We use an additional ureteral catheter (4 Fr) formed of an external removable plastic sheet with one blind tip (see arrow in Figure 2b), containing a straight cylindrical metal stylet coming out from the other tip (see arrow in Figure 2b) and a plastic Klemmer and two 5 mL tubes of lubricant gel (Figure 2a).

The first step consists of assembling the device in a sterile manner as follows: Insert the lubricant gel into the single lumen of the Foley catheter until the gel itself comes out from the tip holes. Insert the blind tip of the ureteral catheter into the lumen of the Foley catheter until it reaches the Foley tip (Figure 2c) and then clamp with the Klemmer the proximal extremity of the Foley, so fixing the Foley catheter and the ureteral catheter contained within (Figure 2d). Using gauze, fold the Foley tip reinforced by the inner ureteral catheter to give it the appearance of a Mercier catheter extremity (Figure 2e) (tip the extremity with an angle of 45 degrees with respect to the major axis of the catheter). Because of the internal partially metallic mandrel, the given shape will be maintained after the force is applied (Figure 2f and Figure 2g). The Klemmer is now oriented to maintain the same direction of the folded tip so that the tip orientation is known every time the catheter is inserted (Figure 2f and Figure 2g). The preparative phase to subsequent catheterization is completed.

After application of common cleaning of the external male genitalia, insert around 10 mL of local anesthetic gel (Lidocaine hydrochloride, 2.5%) into the urethra and then hold the glans penis firmly to prevent the gel being released. Gently press the underside of the penile shaft in a downward direction to favor the distribution of lubricant in the direction of the posterior urethra. Wait a few minutes for the anesthetic to work. Next, wearing a second pair of sterile gloves, retract the foreskin, and hold the penis upright in the non-dominant hand at about 60 to 70 degrees of inclination, supporting with gauze wrapped around it. Just before you begin the catheterization, suggest that the patient take a few more slow deep breaths. This facilitates the relaxation of the urogenital diaphragm and avoids contraction of the external voluntary sphincter due to fear or muscular tension. This passage is useful when attempting to overrun the posterior urethra to reach the bladder. Grasp the catheter near the tip and insert it slowly, eventually by using additional sterile gauze to transfer to a pushing movement of the catheter. Continue to insert the catheter until its bifurcation. After complete insertion, release the Klemmer and extract the ureteral catheter (sheet and metal stylet together). The Foley catheter recovers its original straight tip shape (Figure 2h). Usually, urine doesn't come out immediately because of the gel obstructing the tip of the catheter. By palpating the bladder you will force urine to open the catheter tip holes. Just in case, aspiration by a syringe can help you with this purpose. Only when there is evidence of correct placement of the catheter into the bladder, you can inflate the Foley balloon, retract the catheter on the bladder neck, and cover the glans penis with its prepuce when present.

RESULTS

We tested the described technique in 76 male patients in our hospital requiring transurethral bladder catheterization by a urologist consultant because of a primary failed attempt. Indication of bladder drainage was, in 51 cases, acute retention of urine; other indications were pre-/intraoperative needs in 16 cases and clinical monitoring in 9 cases. The median age was 56.3 (range: 48 to 82), and in all patients there was at least 1 attempt of bladder transurethral catheterization (mean: 1.6) by a non-urologic physician. In most of these patients urological anamnesis was uneventful, thus difficult catheterization was attributable to a bulky prostate due to benign prostate enlargement. Other patients had a history of surgical interventions of the genitourinary tract; 10 patients in particular reported transurethral resection of the prostate and 7 patients reported open radical retropubic prostatectomy. In all cases the difficulty to pass a common Foley catheter (16 Fr) was verified by the urologic consultant. In 65 cases the described technique led to successful passage of the catheter into the bladder, while in 11 cases it was unfruitful. The subsequent management in the latter cases involved the use of a Mercier catheter with a tip hole allowing the passage of a ureteral catheter or a guide wire. This maneuver solved the problem in 5 patients, with concomitant pressure exerted by an assistant in 2 out of 5 cases. For 6 patients it was also unfruitful, and they underwent the successful placement of a suprapubic cystostomy (4 patients) or a flexible cystoscopy (2 patients). The technique was generally well tolerated by all patients and no major complications occurred. We observed urethral bleeding in 12 patients, which stopped by itself in less than 30 minutes in all of these patients. Two patients developed signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection requiring the administration of antibiotics. Finally, in the 2 patients who underwent flexible cystoscopy, a false passage was documented. Table 1 summarizes patient characteristics and results.

DISCUSSION

The task of passing a urethral catheter often involves the active role of junior and inexperienced members of staff, potentially representing a source of medico-legal lawsuits for a urologist [4,5,6,7,8,9], especially when rough and unsuccessful attempts cause the patient distress and complications [2]. In the last few years, malpractice claims burst up to impressive figures, and almost every physician experienced/will experience some kind of claim, at times, in a formal legal setting [10,11,12], as demonstrated by the expanding role of legal medicine and the growth of guidelines in the field [13,14,15].

In this scenario, we described a simple technique for difficult, male, bladder transurethral catheterization, reporting its clinical outcome as a contribution to the body of evidence on this issue [16]. The technique is suitable for all male patients in whom there is no contraindication to urethral catheterization, and it can be performed at the bedside or during office activity, ensuring safety at all times. The technique does not add morbidity compared to simple catheterization and increases the likelihood of successful primary urethral catheterization in the case of acute retention of urine or the need to monitor diuresis in clinical settings. Moreover, it doesn’t require hospital admission, as in the case of placement of a suprapubic catheter. The required experience to place this self-assembled catheter is the same involved for the use of Mercier catheters, and we did not observe a different incidence of complications due to the adoption of this composed device.

Different methods have been described since 1979 in order to overcome difficult transurethral catheterization in different clinical situations (Table 2). Many of them involve the use of a cystoscope, which led to the placement of a guide wire into the bladder after passing the stricture. Nowadays the flexible cystoscope is readily available in urology departments, but it is rarely available in non-urological departments, such as the emergency room or intensive care departments. Moreover, it requires connection to a light source and a water flux, and its use often implies the presence of an assistant. These aspects limit the use of any cystoscope-based technique at the bedside. The most popular method to manage difficult catheterization is the glide-wire technique, first described by Freid and Smith [10]. A hydrophilic-coated glide wire is introduced through the urethra and advanced with gentle, steady pressure until the obstruction is overcome and the wire reaches the bladder. After that, an open-ended ureteral catheter is passed over the wire, the guide wire is substituted with a Teflon-coated guide wire, and finally a Graham catheter is placed over the ureteral catheter guide wire, or alternatively the urethra is dilated until 18 Fr to pass a 16 Fr Foley catheter. The technique was further revisited by others, introducing minor modifications such as the use of a Foley catheter with a cut tip to be passed over the wire [13,14], the use of an ureteric access sheet to be passed over the wire [15,18], or the use of a hydrophilic non-autostatic small catheter in order to place the wire into the bladder [16]. In general, authors using the guide wire technique have reported high success rates. Limitations are that 2 or more passages are needed compared to our methods, and the fact that it is never possible to check the vesical position of the wire, it could be a problem in case of false passage. Another proposed technique is the so-called “Liss maneuver” [19]. A 0.035-inch super stiff guide wire was placed floppy end first down a 18 Fr Foley catheter lumen; the guide wire was then clamped proximally to the body of the catheter at its point of exit. The body of the wire increased the catheter body stiffness while the tip of the catheter, holding the floppy end of the wire, showed no significant increase in stiffness. This method is similar in the concept to the one described in this article. We believe, however, that giving a Mercier-like shape to the tip of the catheter provides more chances to pass the catheter, especially in the case of a bulky prostate due to benign prostate enlargement, because of the anatomical fitting.

The advantage of using the described technique is the chance to easily position a flexible latex catheter supplied with an autostatic inflatable balloon in a single passage by temporarily adapting its tip and reducing its deformability. In this way we are not obliged to substitute a Mercier-type catheter by introduction of a guide to allow subsequent substitution with a Foley catheter modified with a tip hole, or a council catheter [3]. By these tricks, we can afford the task of a difficult catheterization in male patients with a bulky prostate, abating the number of unfruitful attempts and unnecessary passages of other catheters and guides, and the resulting likelihood of complications derived from the repeated procedures.

The armed Foley technique here described was fruitful in a defined clinical situation, such us a bulky prostate, bladder neck stricture from past transurethral resection of the prostate, and stenosis of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy. As other methods, it seems to be more suitable to manage difficult catheterization in different situations, such as strictures of the anterior urethra. We propose an algorithm in order to manage difficult transurethral catheterizations, taking into account this novel method.

CONCLUSION

We described a simple and safe technique to allow catheter insertion in men suffering with different pathologic or anatomic conditions when a primary attempt at simple transurethral catheterization fails. The technique is safe and well tolerated by patients, increasing the overall likelihood of successful primary urethral catheterization without the need for hospital admission.

REFERENCES

  1. Chute, C. G., L. A. Panser, et al. (1993). "The prevalence of prostatism: a population-based survey of urinary symptoms." J Urol 150(1): 85-89. PubMed
  2. Boscolo-Berto, R., D. I. Raduazzo, et al. (2012). "Urethral catheterization in men with artificial urinary sphincter: clinical and legal implications." Urol J 9(3): 611-613. PubMed
  3. Villanueva, C. and G. P. Hemstreet, 3rd (2008). "Difficult male urethral catheterization: a review of different approaches." Int Braz J Urol 34(4): 401-411; discussion 412. PubMed
  4. Boscolo-Berto, R., M. Iafrate, et al. (2010). "Forensic implications in self-insertion of urethral foreign bodies." Can J Urol 17(1): 5026-5027. PubMed
  5. Boscolo-Berto, R., C. Lamon C, et al. (2010). "A major clinical event following transperineal prostate biopsy: An unexpected duodenal perforation." Urotoday Int J 3(2): 1-5.
  6. Boscolo-Berto, R., D. I. Raduazzo, et al. (2011). "Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma mimicking unilateral transitional cell carcinoma of renal pelvis. The risk of making a diagnostic mistake." Arch Ital Urol Androl 83(3): 163-165. PubMed
  7. Boscolo-Berto, R., G. Viel, et al. (2011). "Determinism and liabilities in a complicated transrectal prostate biopsy: what is what." Urologia 78(3): 176-179. PubMed
  8. Boscolo-Berto, R., G. Viel, et al. (2011). "Giant scrotal lymphedema as unique onset sign of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The risk of a misdiagnosis." Arch Ital Urol Androl 83(2): 95-98. PubMed
  9. Boscolo-Berto, R., G. Viel, et al. (2012). "Male infertility after transpelvic gunshot wound injury: a case of clinical and forensic relevance." Urol J 9(4): 714-717. PubMed
  10. Boscolo-Berto, R., G. Viel, et al. (2012). "Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe." Int J Legal Med 126(1): 129-137. PubMed | CrossRef
  11. Ferrara, S. D., T. Bajanowski, et al. (2011). "Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview." Int J Legal Med 125(3): 393-402. PubMed | CrossRef
  12. Viel, G., R. Boscolo-Berto, et al. (2011). "Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe. A country-based analysis." Int J Legal Med 125(5): 717-725. PubMed | CrossRef
  13. Boscolo-Berto, R. (2010). "Legal claims and bias in creating clinical practice guidelines: which step in which direction?" Int J Urol 17(5): 498. PubMed | CrossRef
  14. Boscolo-Berto, R. (2011). "[Facing malpractice litigation: when the guideline fails to guide]." G Ital Nefrol 28(1): 12. PubMed
  15. Ferrara, S. D., E. Baccino, et al. (2013). "Malpractice and medical liability. European Guidelines on Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation." Int J Legal Med 127(3): 545-557. PubMed | CrossRef
  16. Boscolo-Berto, R. (2009). "[Clinical testing and evidence-based medicine: when the absence of evidence doesn't mean evidence of absence]." G Ital Nefrol 26(4): 417. PubMed
  17. Walden, T. B. (1979). "Urethral catheterization in anasarca." Urology 13(1): 82. PubMed
  18. Jordan, G. H., B. H. Winslow, et al. (1985). "Intraoperative consultation for the urethra." Urol Clin North Am 12(3): 447-452. PubMed
  19. Krikler, S. J. (1989). "Flexible urethroscopy: use in difficult male catheterisation." Ann R Coll Surg Engl 71(1): 3. PubMed
  20. Lowe, M. A. and A. J. Defalco (1992). "New endourologic technique for catheter placement after TURP, prostatectomy, and difficult urethroscopy." Urology 40(5): 461-463. PubMed
  21. Cancio, L. C., E. S. Sabanegh, Jr., et al. (1993). "Managing the Foley catheter." Am Fam Physician 48(5): 829-836. PubMed
  22. Beaghler, M., M. Grasso, 3rd, et al. (1994). "Inability to pass a urethral catheter: the bedside role of the flexible cystoscope." Urology 44(2): 268-270. PubMed
  23. Blitz, B. F. (1995). "A simple method using hydrophilic guide wires for the difficult urethral catheterization." Urology 46(1): 99-100. PubMed | CrossRef
  24. Freid, R. M. and A. D. Smith (1996). "The Glidewire technique for overcoming urethral obstruction." J Urol 156(1): 164-165. PubMed
  25. Harkin, D. W., M. Hawe, et al. (1998). "A novel technique for difficult male urethral catheterization." Br J Urol 82(5): 752-753. PubMed
  26. Rozanski, T. A., F. Salazar, et al. (1998). "Direct vision bladder catheterization using a short rigid ureteroscope." Urology 51(5): 827-828. PubMed
  27. Lachat, M. L., U. Moehrlen, et al. (2000). "The Seldinger technique for difficult transurethral catheterization: a gentle alternative to suprapubic puncture." Br J Surg 87(12): 1729-1730. PubMed | CrossRef
  28. Zammit, P. A. and K. German (2004). "The difficult urethral catheterization: use of a hydrophilic guidewire." BJU Int 93(6): 883-884. PubMed | CrossRef
  29. Athanassopoulos, A., E. N. Liatsikos, et al. (2005). "The difficult urethral catheterization: use of a hydrophilic guidewire." BJU Int 95(1): 192. PubMed
  30. Mistry, S., D. Goldfarb, et al. (2007). "Use of hydrophilic-coated urethral catheters in management of acute urinary retention." Urology 70(1): 25-27. PubMed | CrossRef
  31. Chelladurai, A. J., S. J. Srirangam, et al. (2008). "A novel technique to aid urethral catheterisation in patients presenting with acute urinary retention due to urethral stricture disease." Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(1): 77-78. PubMed
  32. Athanasopoulos, A. and E. N. Liatsikos (2009). "The use of a ureteral access sheath for the urethral dilatation and catheterization of difficult urethral strictures." Urol Int 83(3): 359-361. PubMed | CrossRef
  33. Liss, M. A., S. Leifer, et al. (2009). "The Liss maneuver: a nonendoscopic technique for difficult Foley catheterization." J Endourol 23(8): 1227-1230. PubMed | CrossRef
E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe