Retroperitoneal Ganglioneuroma Presenting as a Right Renal Mass in an Adult Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

ABSTRACT

Ganglioneuromas are benign tumors arising from the neural crest. The reported case is a 47-year-old female who presented with right lumbar pain that increased progressively in intensity over the last 3 years. Computed tomography revealed a homogeneous mass located just above and behind the right kidney. The patient underwent a tumorectomy through a lumbar approach. Histology revealed a primary extra-adrenal retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma. Related literature is reviewed.

KEYWORDS: Retroperitoneum; Sympathetic nervous system, Ganglioneuroma; Surgery.

CORRESPONDENCE: Dr. Satâa Sallami, Department of Urology, La Rabta Hospital-University, Tunis 1007, Tunisia ().

CITATION: Urotoday Int J. 2010 Oct;3(5). doi:10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2010.10.03

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS: CT, computed tomography; GN, ganglioneuroma; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

uijpurchasebutton

 

INTRODUCTION

Ganglioneuroma (GN) is a rare, primitive, benign neurogenic tumor [1]. It arises from the primordial neural crest cells that form the sympathetic nervous system [2]. The most common sites of involvement are the posterior mediastinum and retroperitoneum [3].

Most GNs are asymptomatic and found incidentally [1]. They affect newborns and infants more often than adolescents and adults [4]. They are relatively difficult to distinguish from other tumors because of the lack of specific imaging findings [1]. The patient in the present report has a primary extra-adrenal retroperitoneal GN.

CASE REPORT

A 47-year-old woman presented with the chief complaint of right upper quadrant abdominal pain that gradually increased in intensity over the last 3 years. Physical examination was unremarkable.

Ultrasonography revealed a 7 cm heterogeneous, hypoechoic mass with well-defined borders. It was located in the right lumbar region behind the upper pole and independent of the right kidney (Figure 1). Hormonal studies (24-hour urinary catecholamine) were insignificant. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 8.6 cm x 6.6 cm x 7.9 cm solid tumor above the upper pole of the right kidney, with evidence of neovascularity within the tumor (Figure 2). No involvement of the renal vein or inferior vena cava was present. The adrenal gland was normal and no lymph nodes were enlarged.

Because the CT scan results were ambiguous, MRI was performed. The results revealed high signal intensity on T2 (Figure 3). Many diagnoses were suspected, including lymphoma, hematoma, or possibly a hydatid cyst.

Surgical excision was performed through a lumbar incision. Intraoperatively, no abnormality was observed in the right kidney. The excised tumor was well-demarcated behind the upper pole of the right kidney (Figure 4). The adrenal gland was macroscopically normal. The tumor specimen was noncystic, weighing 24 g and measuring 8 cm x 4 cm x 2 cm. It was a large, encapsulated mass of firm consistency with a homogeneous, solid, grayish-white cut surface and a focally edematous appearance (Figure 5).

The postoperative histologic examination revealed a mixture of immature and mature ganglion fibers and neuronal cells that were suggestive of retroperitoneal GN, without any signs of malignancy. Pathological findings showed spindle cells with abundant cytoplasm, big nuclei, and prominent nucleoli without atypia (Figure 6).

The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the 3rd postoperative day. The patient was relieved of her complaints after surgery, and no evidence of recurrence was found at the 9-month follow-up evaluation.

DISCUSSION

GN is a rare, benign tumor that is usually asymptomatic [1,5]. Although GNs usually appear in children, retroperitoneal GNs appear more often in adults [2]. The older mean age of appearance for retroperitoneal GNs is probably explained by the localization of the tumor, its tendency to produce few symptoms, and its slow growth [2]. It has no sex predilection, having a male:female ratio of 1:1 [1].

GNs are mostly sporadic, but there are a few reports of GNs associated with neurofibromatosis type II and multiple endocrinologic neoplasia type II [6]. The most common site of occurrence is the posterior mediastinum and the retroperitoneum [2,3]. Other sites of occurrence include the gastrointestinal tract [7], parapharyngeal area [8], bone [9], supraclavicular area [10], and pelvis [11]. Retroperitoneal GNs are usually nonfunctioning and asymptomatic until they reach large sizes, when they cause symptoms due to local expansion and compression of adjacent structures [12].

Diagnosis of Ganglioneuroma

GN is difficult to distinguish from other tumors due to lack of specific image findings [13]. Ultrasonography reveals a homogeneous, hypoechoic mass with well-defined borders [5]. CT is the most commonly used imaging modality for assessment because it reveals the extent of the tumor, organ of origin, regional invasion, vascular encasement, adenopathy, and calcification [11].

MRI typically shows that GNs are homogeneous with relatively low signal intensity on T1-weighted images [14]. Several reports indicate that relatively high, heterogeneous signal intensity on T2-weighted images correlates with GN; the appearance is presumed to be caused by a combination of myxoid material and relatively few ganglion cells. The MRI may also show curvilinear bands of low signal intensity on T2-weighted images, which give the tumor a whorled appearance [14].

MRI enhancement varies from mild to marked. Typically, GNs demonstrate gradually increasing enhancement rather than early enhancement during contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI, which is similar to the results from contrast-enhanced CT [15]. With either imaging method, retroperitoneal GNs appear as well-circumscribed oval, crescentic, or lobulated masses [14]. They usually reveal some degree of hemorrhage, necrosis, and calcification [1]. A well-circumscribed mass with a tendency to partially or completely surround blood vessels without compressing the lumen was the mainstay of these findings [16].

Increasing numbers of GNs are being found incidentally by ultrasonography or CT [5]. The literature also reports some functional GNs that were found to release peptides such as vasoactive intestinal peptides (VIP), somatostatins, and neuropeptide-Y (NPY) [17,18]. These tumors may cause some symptoms like diarrhea, sweating, and hypertension related to the peptides [2].

Although catecholamine synthesis is an almost constant feature of all neurogenic tumors, GNs rarely lead to symptoms [19]. Consequently, surgeons should be aware of the possibility of hypertensive crisis during the surgery [17,18].

Interestingly, GNs tend to partially or completely surround major blood vessels, with little or no compromise of the lumen [14]. Ichikawa et al [20]reported an interesting contrast enhancement pattern in GN that consisted of delayed heterogeneous uptake. These enhancement features are explained by the presence of an abundance of myxoid matrices in the tumors, resulting in delayed progressive accumulation of contrast material in the extracellular space.

The definitive diagnosis is usually based on histopathological findings after surgical excision of the tumor. Grossly, GNs are large, encapsulated masses of firm consistency with a homogenous, solid, grayish-white cut surface [2].

GNs are fully differentiated and invariably benign. They can be multiple and/or associated with other independent types of neural or neuroendocrine neoplasms [21]. Pathologically, GNs should be differentiated from ganglioneuroblastomas, which have a ganglioneuromatous component of more than 5%; the ganglioneuromatous component of GN is minimal [1].

Management of Ganglioneuroma

Treatment of GN consists of complete surgical resection of the tumor, when possible [5]. Preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy has no value, unless the GN was associated with ganglioneuroblastoma changes. In this case, there might be some role for chemotherapy [12]. Some investigators have indicated that conservative management in cases that are not amenable to complete resection still results in a good prognosis [3,12]. However, surgery should be performed for the following conditions: symptoms resulting from the tumor, encroachment on vertebral foramina, marked growth in size, and increased secretory activity of catecholamine [12]. It should be kept in mind that GNs have a metastatic potential [10]. For example, one study reported that removal of an abdominal GN with the surrounding lymph nodes revealed another GN in one of the lymph nodes [12].

The possibility of slow progression and late recurrence of GNs has been reported; therefore, long-term periodic radiologic surveillance postoperatively is necessary to assess the malignant potential of these tumors [5,22]. GNs are compatible with long-term, disease-free survival even with unsatisfactory surgical treatment [12]. The prognosis is good [2]. In the case of GN recurrence, surgery should be considered [22].

CONCLUSIONS

GNs are slow-growing, benign tumors that have a tendency to remain clinically silent for a considerable period of time. The radiological aspect is not specific. Treatment is surgical. Most patients have prolonged survival without any evidence of progression after surgery, but long-term follow-up is recommended.

Conflict of Interest:

REFERENCES

  1. Singh KJ, Suri A, Vijjan V, Singh P, Srivastava A. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma presenting as right renal mass. Urology. 2006;67(5):1085.e7-8.
  2. PubMed
  3. Lamichhane N, Dhakal HP. Ganglioneuroma of pelvis--an unique presentation in a young man. Nepal Med Coll J. 2006;8(4):288-291.
  4. PubMed
  5. Geoerger B, Hero B, Harms D, Grebe J, Scheidhauer K, Berthold F. Metabolic activity and clinical features of primary ganglioneuromas. Cancer. 2001; 91(10): 1905–1913.
  6. PubMed; CrossRef
  7. Zugor V, Amann K, Schrott KM, Schott GE. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma [in German]. Aktuelle Urol. 2005;36(4):349-352.
  8. PubMed; CrossRef
  9. Aktoz T, Kaplan M, Usta U, Atakan IH, Inci O. Retroperitoneal Ganglioneuroma. Trakya Univ Tip Fak Derg. 2009;26:163-165.
  10. Jain M, Shubha BS, Sethi S, Banga V, Bagga D. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma: report of a case diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology, with review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;21(3):194-196.
  11. PubMed
  12. Rao BS, Ravi G. Ganglioneuroma of small intestine presenting with perforation peritonitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2001;20(1): 31-32.
  13. PubMed
  14. Albonico G, Pellegrino G, Maisano M, Kardon DE. Ganglioneuroma of parapharyngeal region. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125(9):1217–1218.
  15. PubMed
  16. Mithöfer K, Grabowski EF, Rosenberg AE, Ryan DP, Mankin HJ. Symptomatic ganglioneuroma of bone. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(11):1589–1595.
  17. PubMed
  18. McRae D Jr, Shaw A. Ganglioneuroma heterochromia iridis and Horner’s syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1979;14(5): 612-614.
  19. PubMed; CrossRef
  20. Lonergan GJ, Schwab CM, Suarez ES, Carlson CL. Neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):911-934.
  21. PubMed
  22. Hayes FA, Green AA, Rao BN. Clinical manifestations of ganglioneuroma. Cancer. 1989;63(6):1211-1214.
  23. PubMed
  24. Fujita T, Maru N, Iwamura M, Tojo T, Yoshida K, Baba S. Two cases of ganglioneuroma [in Japanese]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2003;49(2):107-110.
  25. PubMed
  26. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Chun HJ, Lee HG, Lee JM. Neurogenic tumors in the abdomen: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics. 2003;23(1):29-43.
  27. PubMed; CrossRef
  28. Zhang Y, Nishimura H, Kato S, et al. MRI of ganglioneuroma: histologic correlation study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25(4):617-623.
  29. PubMed; CrossRef
  30. Preidler KW, Ranner G, Szolar D, Walch C, Anderhuber W. Retropharyngeal ganglioneuroma: ultrasound, CT and MRI findings in a 57-year-old patient. Eur J Radiol. 1995;19(2):108-110.
  31. PubMed; CrossRef
  32. Moriwaki Y, Miyaka M, Yamamoto T, et al. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma: a case report and review of the Japanese literature. Intern Med. 1992;31(1):82-85.
  33. PubMed; CrossRef
  34. Bjellerup P, Theodorsson E, Kogner P. Somatostatin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma: chromatographic characterization and release during surgery. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(4):481-485.
  35. PubMed; CrossRef
  36. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B. Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee. Cancer. 1999;86(2):349-363.
  37. PubMed
  38. Ichikawa T, Ohtomo K, Araki T, et al. Ganglioneuroma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance features. Br J Radiol. 1996;69(818):114-121.
  39. PubMed; CrossRef
  40. Zare S, Parvin M, Ghohestani SM. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma. Urol J. 2008;5(4):232.
  41. PubMed
  42. Papavramidis TS, Michalopoulos N, Georgia K, et al. Retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma in an adult patient: a case report and literature review of the last decade. South Med J. 2009;102(10):1065-1067.
  43. PubMed
E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe