Diagnostic practice and awareness of SDH- and FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma: results from an Italian Study Group of uropathology (GIUP) survey.

Metabolic renal cell carcinomas (RCC) deficient in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) or fumarate hydratase (FH) are rare but clinically significant entities formalized in the last WHO classification. Their recognition typically starts from morphology and is corroborated by targeted immunohistochemistry (IHC) and, where appropriate, molecular and germline testing.

In routine practice, however, implementation may be uneven. Hence, we conducted a nationwide, web-based survey (made by 25 items) among members of the Italian Study Group of Uropathology (GIUP) to map real-world awareness, diagnostic pathways, and test availability across Italian centers. Twenty-one pathologists responded; 18/21 (85.7%) reported dedicated uropathology practice with heterogeneous seniority (≤ 5 years, 28.6%; 5-10 years, 19.0%; 10-20 years, 14.3%; > 20 years, 38.1%). Despite substantial renal-tumor workloads (12/20, 57.1% handled > 100 cases in the previous 5 years), direct exposure to metabolic RCCs remained limited (FH-deficient ≥ 1 case, 11/21, 52.4%; SDH-deficient ≥ 1 case, 9/21, 42.9%). Suspicion was predominantly morphology-led: for SDH-deficient RCC, morphology ranked first in 16/21 (76.2%) with the commonest sequence morphology > age > number of lesions (76.2%); for FH-deficient RCC, morphology was top-ranked in 19/21 (90.5%). Key morphologic cues were mixed architectural patterns/papillary elements/macronucleoli for FH-deficient RCC, and eosinophilic cytoplasm with solid-alveolar architecture for SDH-deficient RCC. IHC mirrored these priorities (FH top for FH-deficient, 85.7%; SDHB top for SDH-deficient, 76.2%), whereas 2-succinocysteine (2SC) was rarely available (1/21, 4.8%). Critically, this FH-loss-only workflow can miss non-truncating FH variants (FH immunoreactive but enzymatically inactive) tumors, contributing to under-recognition. Molecular testing would be requested in all suspected cases by 12/21 (57.1%); among selective users, equivocal IHC was the leading trigger (6/8, 75%). Overall, metabolic RCC recognition in Italy is primarily morphology-driven but constrained by uneven access to confirmatory IHC, particularly 2SC, and to molecular assays. The findings argue for harmonized diagnostic algorithms, regional reference laboratory networks, and routine involvement of molecular tumor boards, supported by targeted educational initiatives (including curated digital slide repositories), to standardize practice and improve patient pathways from morphologic suspicion to genetic counselling and tailored surveillance.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology. 2026 Feb 04 [Epub ahead of print]

Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli, Anna Caliò, Stefano Marletta, Maria Ballotta, Marco Barella, Guido Bellezza, Paola Bianco, Angelo Giovanni Bonadio, Piergiuseppe Colombo, Alessandro D'Amuri, Giovanni De Chiara, Veronica Errigo, Denise Fiorini, Francesca Franzi, Daniele Liscia, Lisa Marcolini, Daniela Onnis, Francesca Pagliuca, Antonio Paniccià Bonifazi, Francesco Pierconti, Barbara Pozzi, Lavinia Stefanizzi, Marina Valeri, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Guido Martignoni

Division of Pathology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy., Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy., Division of Pathology, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy., Pathology Unit, AULSS 5 Polesana, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy., Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy., Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy., Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy., Pathology Unit, S. Giacomo Hospital, Novi Ligure, Italy., Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy., Pathology Unit, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy., Pathology Unit, A.O.R.N. "San Giuseppe Moscati", Avellino, Italy., Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, San Paolo Hospital - ASL2 Liguria, Savona, Italy., Pathology Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy., Pathology and Histology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Circolo and Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy., Pathology Unit, Biella Hospital, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy., Pathology Unit, ARNAS "G. Brotzu", Cagliari, Italy., Pathology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy., Pathology Unit, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy., Institute of Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy., Pathology Unit, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy., Pathology Unit, ASST Bergamo Est - Bolognini Hospital, Seriate, Bergamo, Italy., Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy., Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. .

Go Beyond the Abstract and Read a Commentary by the Authors