Impact of the site of metastases on survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer - Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the impact of the site of metastases on survival in patients with stage IV prostate cancer (PCa).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of metastatic phenotype at presentation on mortality in stage IV PCa.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 3857 patients presenting with metastatic PCa between 1991 and 2009, included in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database were evaluated.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTIC ANALYSES: Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were estimated in the overall population and after stratifying patients according to the metastatic site (lymph node [LN] alone, bone, visceral, or bone plus visceral). Multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the relationship between the site of metastases and survival. All analyses were repeated in a subcohort of patients with a single metastatic site involved.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Respectively, 2.8%, 80.2%, 6.1%, and 10.9% of patients presented with LN, bone, visceral, and bone plus visceral metastases at diagnosis. Respective median overall survival and cancer-specific survival were 43 mo and 61 mo for LN metastases, 24 mo and 32 mo for bone metastases, 16 mo and 26 mo for visceral metastases, and 14 mo and 19 mo for bone plus visceral metastases (p< 0.001). In multivariable analyses, patients with visceral metastases had a significantly higher risk of overall and cancer-specific mortality versus those with exclusively LN metastases (p< 0.001). The unfavorable impact of visceral metastases persisted in the oligometastatic subgroup. Our study is limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS: Visceral involvement represents a negative prognostic factor and should be considered as a proxy of more aggressive disease in patients presenting with metastatic PCa. This parameter might indicate the need for additional systemic therapies in these individuals.

PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with visceral metastases should be considered as affected by more aggressive disease and might benefit from the inclusion in clinical trials evaluating novel molecules.

Written by:
Gandaglia G, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Passoni NM, Schiffmann J, Trudeau V, Graefen M, Montorsi F, Sun M.   Are you the author?
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Reference: Eur Urol. 2014 Aug 6. pii: S0302-2838(14)00672-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.020


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 25108577

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe