Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer - Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among men with localized prostate cancer; however, important questions regarding long-term benefit remain.

METHODS: Between 1989 and 1999, we randomly assigned 695 men with early prostate cancer to watchful waiting or radical prostatectomy and followed them through the end of 2012. The primary end points in the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4 (SPCG-4) were death from any cause, death from prostate cancer, and the risk of metastases. Secondary end points included the initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy.

RESULTS: During 23.2 years of follow-up, 200 of 347 men in the surgery group and 247 of the 348 men in the watchful-waiting group died. Of the deaths, 63 in the surgery group and 99 in the watchful-waiting group were due to prostate cancer; the relative risk was 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.77; P=0.001), and the absolute difference was 11.0 percentage points (95% CI, 4.5 to 17.5). The number needed to treat to prevent one death was 8. One man died after surgery in the radical-prostatectomy group. Androgen-deprivation therapy was used in fewer patients who underwent prostatectomy (a difference of 25.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.7 to 32.3). The benefit of surgery with respect to death from prostate cancer was largest in men younger than 65 years of age (relative risk, 0.45) and in those with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (relative risk, 0.38). However, radical prostatectomy was associated with a reduced risk of metastases among older men (relative risk, 0.68; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS: Extended follow-up confirmed a substantial reduction in mortality after radical prostatectomy; the number needed to treat to prevent one death continued to decrease when the treatment was modified according to age at diagnosis and tumor risk. A large proportion of long-term survivors in the watchful-waiting group have not required any palliative treatment. (Funded by the Swedish Cancer Society and others.).

Written by:
Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Rider JR, Taari K, Busch C, Nordling S, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Spångberg A, Andrén O, Palmgren J, Steineck G, Adami HO, Johansson JE.   Are you the author?
Departments of Surgical Sciences and Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, and the Regional Cancer Center Uppsala Örebro, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University; Department of Urology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro; Department of Urology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, and Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden; King's College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, London; Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Department of Urology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.

Reference: N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 24597866

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

 

 

 

 

 

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe