Using data from our institutional Active Surveillance Program, which has enrolled men with favorable-risk prostate cancer since 1995, we found no significant association between a history of vasectomy and risk of disease upgrading, also termed grade reclassification. This was consistent even after adjusting for known clinical predictors of grade progression, such as PSA density and number of cores positive for cancer on biopsy. We also evaluated whether the time from vasectomy to prostate cancer diagnosis influenced risk of progression and found no meaningful association.
Our findings offer reassurance to patients and clinicians: a history of vasectomy does not appear to portend more aggressive disease in men undergoing active surveillance. This study is valuable for patients weighing treatment options or continuing on active surveillance who may worry that past decisions could impact their future. After all, data is not just about clarity. They can bring peace of mind.
Written by:
- Aurora J. Grutman, MPH, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Christian P. Pavlovich, MD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA