The optimal treatment for Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer is unknown.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
To compare clinical outcomes of patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer after definitive treatment.
Retrospective cohort study in 12 tertiary centers (11 in the United States, 1 in Norway), with 1809 patients treated between 2000 and 2013.
Radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy, or EBRT plus brachytherapy boost (EBRT+BT) with androgen deprivation therapy.
The primary outcome was prostate cancer-specific mortality; distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were secondary outcomes.
Of 1809 men, 639 underwent RP, 734 EBRT, and 436 EBRT+BT. Median ages were 61, 67.7, and 67.5 years; median follow-up was 4.2, 5.1, and 6.3 years, respectively. By 10 years, 91 RP, 186 EBRT, and 90 EBRT+BT patients had died. Adjusted 5-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates were RP, 12% (95% CI, 8%-17%); EBRT, 13% (95% CI, 8%-19%); and EBRT+BT, 3% (95% CI, 1%-5%). EBRT+BT was associated with significantly lower prostate cancer-specific mortality than either RP or EBRT (cause-specific HRs of 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.68] and 0.41 [95% CI, 0.24-0.71]). Adjusted 5-year incidence rates of distant metastasis were RP, 24% (95% CI, 19%-30%); EBRT, 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%); and EBRT+BT, 8% (95% CI, 5%-11%). EBRT+BT was associated with a significantly lower rate of distant metastasis (propensity-score-adjusted cause-specific HRs of 0.27 [95% CI, 0.17-0.43] for RP and 0.30 [95% CI, 0.19-0.47] for EBRT). Adjusted 7.5-year all-cause mortality rates were RP, 17% (95% CI, 11%-23%); EBRT, 18% (95% CI, 14%-24%); and EBRT+BT, 10% (95% CI, 7%-13%). Within the first 7.5 years of follow-up, EBRT+BT was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (cause-specific HRs of 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46-0.96] for RP and 0.61 [95% CI, 0.45-0.84] for EBRT). After the first 7.5 years, the corresponding HRs were 1.16 (95% CI, 0.70-1.92) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.57-1.32). No significant differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality, distant metastasis, or all-cause mortality (≤7.5 and >7.5 years) were found between men treated with EBRT or RP (cause-specific HRs of 0.92 [95% CI, 0.67-1.26], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.70-1.14], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.80-1.44], and 1.34 [95% CI, 0.85-2.11]).
Among patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer, treatment with EBRT+BT with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with significantly better prostate cancer-specific mortality and longer time to distant metastasis compared with EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy or with RP.
JAMA. 2018 Mar 06 [Epub]
Amar U Kishan, Ryan R Cook, Jay P Ciezki, Ashley E Ross, Mark M Pomerantz, Paul L Nguyen, Talha Shaikh, Phuoc T Tran, Kiri A Sandler, Richard G Stock, Gregory S Merrick, D Jeffrey Demanes, Daniel E Spratt, Eyad I Abu-Isa, Trude B Wedde, Wolfgang Lilleby, Daniel J Krauss, Grace K Shaw, Ridwan Alam, Chandana A Reddy, Andrew J Stephenson, Eric A Klein, Daniel Y Song, Jeffrey J Tosoian, John V Hegde, Sun Mi Yoo, Ryan Fiano, Anthony V D'Amico, Nicholas G Nickols, William J Aronson, Ahmad Sadeghi, Stephen Greco, Curtiland Deville, Todd McNutt, Theodore L DeWeese, Robert E Reiter, Johnathan W Said, Michael L Steinberg, Eric M Horwitz, Patrick A Kupelian, Christopher R King
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles., Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles., Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland., Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts., Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts., Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania., Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland., Department of Radiation Oncology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York., Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, West Virginia., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor., Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway., Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan., Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio., Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles., Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California., Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles.