OBJECTIVE - Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in Western countries. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have caused significant pressure on health care budgets.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
We aimed to exemplify this dilemma presenting an example, radium-223 (Xofigo®), and review the literature.
METHODS - A 74-year-old man diagnosed with mCRPC was referred to our department in October 2014 for radium-223 therapy. We faced the following dilemma: is radium-223 standard therapy? Is it cost-effective? Medline was searched employing the following search criteria: "radium-223", "alpharadin", "Xofigo" and "prostate". Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied. Guidelines and cost-effectiveness analyses were focused. We also searched the websites of ASCO, ESMO and ISPOR. The web was searched, using Yahoo and Google search engines, for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs).
RESULTS - 181 publications were identified in the Medline database. Only four studies included the word "cost", three "economics" and none "budget" in heading or abstract. None of the publications were thorough of cost analysis (cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-minimizing or cost-of-illness analysis). Six HTAs and eight national guidelines were identified. The cost per quality adjusted life years was indicated €80. 000-94,000. HTAs concluded reimbursement being not recommendable or no ultimate statement could be made. One pointed towards a limited use with caution.
CONCLUSIONS - Guidelines were based on data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Health economics was not considered when guidelines were made. Most HTAs concluded this therapy not cost-effective or there was insufficient data for final conclusions. Licensing and reimbursement processes should be run simultaneously.
Global journal of health science. 2015 Jul 30*** epublish ***
Jan Norum, Erik R Traasdahl, Arpad Totth, Carsten Nieder, Jan Abel Olsen
1Northern Norway Regional Health Authority Trust, Bodø, Norway. 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical Imaging Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; 3Department of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway;.