ERBB2/HER2 alterations in ctDNA and metachronous tissues of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer

Purpose: HER2 targeting is increasingly relevant in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) due to emerging antibody drug conjugates, where assessment of tumor HER2/ERBB2 status could aid interpretation of ongoing trials. We evaluated whether precise ERBB2 genotype can be determined from mUC circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and the relationship with tissue status.

Experimental design: ERBB2 genotype was determined through targeted sequencing of longitudinal samples from 226 mUC patients. Heterogeneity was evaluated across ctDNA and metachronous tumor tissue ERBB2 genotype and compared to HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results: Activating ERBB2 mutation and/or amplification was identified in 16% and 29% of patients by ctDNA and tissue sequencing, respectively. Alternatively, 55% of tissue samples were HER2 IHC positive. Agreement between HER2 IHC and ERBB2 genotype (by either ctDNA or tissue) was 64%, in contrast to 87% between patient-matched ctDNA and tissue genotypes. Across serial samples, genotype and IHC revealed marked heterogeneity in ERBB2 status. Factors linked with heterogeneity included ERBB2 amplifications on extrachromosomal DNA, detected through whole-genome sequencing of ctDNA and fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and subclonal ERBB2 mutations, which were evident in half of ctDNA and one third of tissue samples.

Conclusions: We report a combined analysis of HER2 IHC and ERBB2 genotype in mUC ctDNA and archival tissue, revealing high spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Our data suggests sole reliance on DNA or protein-based HER2 assessment is insufficient to capture nuanced genomic indicators of HER2 pathway reliance, and support a role for ctDNA alongside existing methods for characterizing HER2/ERBB2 status during biomarker development in mUC.

Gillian Vandekerkhove,1 Andrew J Murtha,2 David C Müller,3 Maria Stephenson,1 Kimia Rostin,1 Aslı D Munzur,1 Carlos Vasquez-Rios,1 Jussi Nikkola,4 Joonatan Sipola,5 Matti Annala,6 Cameron Herberts,1 Emily Fung,1 Jaskirat Atwal,1 Sadeem Al-Subaie,7 Karan Parekh,1 Cecily Q Bernales,1 Gráinne Donnellan,1 Daygen Finch,8 Krista Noonan,9 Jenny J Ko,10 Guliz Ozgun,11 Lucia Nappi,11 Christian Kollmannsberger,12 Jean-Michel Lavoie,11 Sunil Parimi,13 Tilman Todenhöfer,14 Piet Ost,15 Gang Wang,7 Peter C Black,2 Corinne Maurice-Dror,16 Kim N Chi,11 Bernhard J Eigl,7 Alexander W Wyatt1

  1. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  2. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  3. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  4. Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  5. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  6. Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
  7. British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  8. BC Cancer Cancer Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
  9. BC Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada.
  10. BC Cancer, Abbotsford, BC, Canada.
  11. BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  12. BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  13. BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  14. Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Germany.
  15. Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
  16. BC Cancer-Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Source: Vandekerkhove G., Murtha AJ., Müller DC. et al. ERBB2/HER2 alterations in ctDNA and metachronous tissues of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3912. 

Read an Expert Commentary by Bishoy Faltas, MD