Solifenacin for overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis - Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin for treating overactive bladder.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and extracted from MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Jadad score, and heterogeneity was analyzed using the chi-squared test. The data of the included RCTs were collected, extracted, and assessed by our protocol. A total of nine RCTs were identified from the search strategy. Compared with the placebo and tolterodine treatments, both short-term (mostly 12-week) trials indicated that solifenacin significantly reduced urgency episodes, micturitions, and incontinence episodes per 24 h. Compared with the solifenacin (5 mg) group, the solifenacin (10 mg) group was significantly better in terms of the number of micturitions per 24 h. With regard to adverse effects, the patients treated with solifenacin had significantly higher rates of constipation and blurred vision than patients treated with tolterodine. The solifenacin therapy was not inferior to tolterodine in terms of efficacy profiles and had a similar incidence of overall adverse events compared with tolterodine treatment. Solifenacin (5 mg) is thus a recommended dose because of its reported balance between efficacy and acceptable tolerability.

Written by:
Luo D, Liu L, Han P, Wei Q, Shen H. Are you the author?
Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.

Reference: Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb 7. Epub ahead of print.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1641-7

PubMed Abstract
PMID: 22310924



SUFU MyBladder app
email news signup