To assess reliability of Guy's, Seoul National University renal stone (S-RESC) and S.T.O.N.E. scores in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and assess utility in discriminating outcomes [Stone free rate (SFR), complications, need for multiple PCNL sessions and auxiliary procedures] valid across parameters of experience of surgeon, independence from surgical approach, and variations in institution-specific instrumentation.
Prospectively maintained database of 2 tertiary institutions was analysed (606 cases). Institutes differed in instrumentation while overall surgical team comprised - two trainees (experience <100 cases), two junior consultants (experience 100-200 cases) and two senior surgeons (experience >1000 cases). Scores were assigned and reassigned after 4 months by one trainee and expert surgeon. Interrater and test-retest agreement were analysed by Cohen's kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficient. Multivariate logistic regression models were created adjusting outcomes for the institution, comorbidity, amplatz size, access tract location, the number of punctures, the experience level of the surgeon, and individual scoring system, and receiver operating curves were analysed for comparison.
Despite some areas of inconsistencies, individually all scores had excellent interrater and test-retest concordance. On multivariable analyses while the experience of the surgeon and surgical approach characteristics (such as access tract location, amplatz size, and number of punctures) remained independently associated with different outcomes in varying combinations, calculus complexity scores were found consistently independently associated with all outcomes. S-RESC score had a superior association with SFR, the need for multiple PCNL sessions and auxiliary procedures.
Individually all scoring systems performed well. On cross comparison, S-RESC score consistently emerged more superiorly associated with all outcomes signifying the importance of the distributional complexity of calculus (which also indirectly amalgamates influence of stone number, size, and anatomic location) in discriminating outcomes. Our study proves the utility of scores in prognosticating multiple outcomes and also clarifies important aspects of their practical application including future roles such as benchmarking, audit, training and objective assessment of surgical technique modifications. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
BJU international. 2016 Jul 22 [Epub ahead of print]
Jiten Jaipuria, Manav Suryavanshi, Tridib K Sen
Go “Beyond the Abstract” - Read an article commentary written by the authors
DNB Urology trainee, Department of Urology, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Prashanthigram, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India., Head- Endourology and Robotic Surgery, Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, India, 122001., Department of Urology, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Prashanthigram, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India, 515134.