Many patients diagnosed with prostate cancer search for information on robotic prostatectomy (RobP) on the Web. We aimed to evaluate the qualitative characteristics of the mostly frequented Web sites on RobP with a particular emphasis on provider-dependent issues.
Google was searched for the term "robotic prostatectomy" in Europe and North America. The mostly frequented Web sites were selected and classified as physician-provided and publically-provided. Quality was measured using Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, DISCERN score, and addressing of Trifecta surgical outcomes. Popularity was analyzed using Google PageRank and Alexa tool. Accessibility, usability, and reliability were investigated using the LIDA tool and readability was assessed using readability indices.
Twenty-eight Web sites were physician-provided and 15 publically-provided. For all Web sites, 88% of JAMA benchmark criteria were fulfilled, DISCERN quality score was high, and 81% of Trifecta outcome measurements were addressed. Popularity was average according to Google PageRank (mean 2. 9 ± 1. 5) and Alexa Traffic Rank (median, 49,109; minimum, 7; maximum, 8,582,295). Accessibility (85 ± 7%), usability (92 ± 3%), and reliability scores (88 ± 8%) were moderate to high. Automated Readability Index was 7. 2 ± 2. 1 and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 9 ± 2, rating the Web sites as difficult to read. Physician-provided Web sites had higher quality scores and lower readability compared with publically-provided Web sites.
Websites providing information on RobP obtained medium to high ratings in all domains of quality in the current assessment. In contrast, readability needs to be significantly improved so that this content can become available for the populace.
Clinical genitourinary cancer. 2015 Dec 23 [Epub ahead of print]
Hendrik Borgmann, René Mager, Johannes Salem, Johannes Bründl, Frank Kunath, Christian Thomas, Axel Haferkamp, Igor Tsaur
Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany. Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. , Department of Urology, St-Josefs-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany. , Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. , UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. , Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. , Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. , Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.