Morbidity and efficacy of ureteroscopic stone treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder - Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a lack of information on the safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy in the neurogenic bladder population.

We hypothesized that ureteroscopy in patients with neurogenic bladder would be associated with an increased risk of complications and a lower stone clearance rate than in patients without neurological impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a local registry of patients with ICD-9 codes for urolithiasis between 2004 and 2012. The study cohort was assembled from all eligible patients with neurogenic bladder and a randomly selected control group that had undergone ureteroscopy. Statistical analysis of demographic variables and surgical outcomes was performed. Complications were classified according to the Clavien system. Clearance was defined by computerized tomography, renal/bladder ultrasound or direct ureterorenoscopy.

RESULTS: Ureteroscopy was performed a total of 173 times in 127 controls and a total of 45 times in 20 patients with neurogenic bladder. There was no difference between presenting episodes by gender (p = 1.0), race (p = 0.654) or body mass index (p = 0.519). Bacteriuria was associated with the stone episode in 16.4% of controls and 67% of neurogenic bladder cases (p < 0.001). Median operative time was significantly longer in those with neurogenic bladder (80.5 minutes, IQR 50-110.5 vs 52, IQR 33-78, p = 0.0003). The proportion of complications was significantly different (p = 0.013). Stones cleared in 86.6% of controls compared to 63% of neurogenic bladder cases (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neurogenic bladder have increased morbidity after ureteroscopy for upper tract calculi compared to neurologically unaffected controls. Infection has a role in this morbidity. The clearance rate is lower but the stone burden is more significant in those with neurogenic bladder.

Written by:
Christman MS, Kalmus A, Casale P.   Are you the author?
Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California.

Reference: J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4 Suppl):1479-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.101


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23454151

UroToday.com Endourology Section