ASCO GU 2026: Patient Experiences with UGN-102 for Recurrence LG-IR-NMIBC: Insights for Shared Decision Making

(UroToday.com) The 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary (ASCO GU) cancers symposium held in San Francisco, CA, between February 26th and 28th, 2026, was host to the Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer and Urothelial Carcinoma. Dr. Ruchika Talwar presented the poster: Patient experiences with UGN-102 for recurrence of low-grade, intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (LG-IR-NMIBC): Insights for shared decision making.

Dr. Talwar emphasized that recurrent low-grade intermediate-risk NMIBC is a chronic and relapsing disease, where treatment decisions often balance efficacy with quality of life and procedural burden. While TURBT remains a common approach, UGN-102, a recently FDA-approved reverse thermal hydrogel containing 75 mg mitomycin, offers a non-surgical alternative. She underscored the importance of understanding patient experience to guide shared decision making.

The ENVISION study (NCT05243550) evaluated patient-reported outcomes using the EORTC-QLQ-NMIBC24 instrument in patients with biopsy-confirmed recurrent LG-IR-NMIBC who had at least one prior NMIBC episode.1 Patients received six once-weekly outpatient intravesical instillations of UGN-102. In addition, 32 US-based participants completed prospective semi-structured phone interviews comparing their prior TURBT experience at enrollment with their experience on UGN-102 at 3 months. The study design is illustrated below:


A total of 240 patients were enrolled, and 232 patients with previous NMIBC were included. Notably, 95% completed all six instillations of UGN-102.

At both 3 and 12 months, mean changes from baseline in domains including malaise, intravesical treatment issues, risk of contaminating a partner, sexual problems, and sexual function did not reach minimal clinically important difference thresholds, indicating overall stability in quality-of-life measures.


The qualitative phone interviews provided additional context. Patients reported greater interference with routines and responsibilities after TURBT compared with UGN-102. Urinary symptoms were perceived as similar between approaches, but patients expressed more concern about bleeding with TURBT. Most described UGN-102 as less invasive, less painful, and less time-consuming overall, and indicated they would recommend it over surgery. A smaller subset preferred TURBT because it is completed in a single day rather than requiring six weekly instillations.

Dr. Talwar concluded with several key points:

  • UGN-102 maintained stable quality-of-life scores across validated NMIBC24 domains.
  • Most patients preferred UGN-102 over repeat surgical resection due to its less invasive profile.
  • Some patients favored TURBT for its one-day convenience, highlighting individual trade-offs.
  • These findings support shared decision-making in recurrent LG-IR-NMIBC, helping clinicians and patients weigh convenience against invasiveness when selecting therapy.

Presented by: Ruchika Talwar, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

 
Reference:

 

  1. Prasad SM, Shishkov D, Mihaylov NV, Khuskivadze A, Genov P, Terzi V, Kates M, Huang WC, Louie MJ, Raju S, Burger B, Meads A, Schoenberg M. Primary Chemoablation of Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With UGN-102: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial (ENVISION). J Urol. 2025 Feb;213(2):205-216. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004296. Epub 2024 Oct 24. PMID: 39446087; PMCID: PMC12708048.