FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
In the nivolumab arm (n=26), 50% of patients have a complete response or partial response, vs 48% of patients in the nivolumab + bevacizumab arm (n=38), compared with 39% in the nivolumab + ipilimumab arm (n=26). There was no significant difference between progression free survival in between the three arms but the main goal of this study was to establish the safety of the therapy. Grade 3+ adverse events ranged from 24-30% between the in the three arms which was acceptable per Dr. Shuch.
Given this trial design, Dr. Shuch noted that the authors now have a very rich supply of tissue which they can use to compare differences in immune environments between the responders and non-responders. Already, some data has signaling data has revealed increased interferon gamma signaling in the responders compared to non-responders as expected, as well as increased immune cell signals in both pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues.
In conclusion, Shuch stated that pre-surgical therapy with nivolumab + bevacizumab or ipilimumab is safe with good clinical benefit and for those patients who are able to stay on therapy, they had excellent disease control with rates as high as 69-93% (CR/PR/SD). Further immune/molecular correlative studies are likely to be produced from this study which may highlight important biomarkers for mono and dual therapy checkpoint therapy in combination with anti-VEGF therapy.
Presented by: Jianjun Gao, MD, Ph.D. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Discussion by: Brian Shuch, MD
1. Curti BD. Immunotherapy in Advanced Renal Cancer — Is Cure Possible? New England Journal of Medicine 2018;378:1344-5.
2. Dutcher JP, Atkins M, Fisher R, et al. Interleukin-2-based therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer: the Cytokine Working Group experience, 1989-1997. The cancer journal from Scientific American 1997;3:S73-8.
3. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine 2018;378:1277-90.
Written by: Jason Zhu, MD. Fellow, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Duke University, at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting - June 1-5, 2018 – Chicago, IL USA