Pelvic lymph-node staging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to extended pelvic lymph-node dissection in primary prostate cancer - the SALT trial.

The detection of lymph-node metastases (N1) with conventional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) is inadequate for primarily diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is successfully introduced for the staging of (biochemically) recurrent PCa. Besides the frequently used 68gallium-labelled PSMA tracers, 18fluorine-labelled PSMA tracers are available. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT for lymph-node staging in primary PCa.

This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with primary PCa underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND). Patients were included between October 2017 and January 2020. A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) nomogram risk probability of ≥ 8% of lymph-node metastases was set to perform ePLND. All images were reviewed by two experienced nuclear physicians, and were compared with post-operative histopathologic results.

A total of 117 patients was analysed. Lymph-node metastases (N1) were histologically diagnosed in 17/117 patients (14.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases on a patient level were 41.2% (confidence interval (CI): 19.4-66.5%), 94.0% (CI 86.9-97.5%), 53.8% (CI 26.1-79.6%) and 90.4% (CI 82.6-95.0%), respectively.

18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a high specificity (94.4%), yet a limited sensitivity (41.2%) for the detection of pelvic lymph-node metastases in primary PCa. This implies that current PSMA PET/CT imaging cannot replace diagnostic ePLND. Further research is necessary to define the exact place of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the primary staging of PCa.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2020 Aug 12 [Epub ahead of print]

B H E Jansen, Y J L Bodar, G J C Zwezerijnen, D Meijer, J P van der Voorn, J A Nieuwenhuijzen, M Wondergem, T A Roeleveld, R Boellaard, O S Hoekstra, R J A van Moorselaar, D E Oprea-Lager, A N Vis

Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ., Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ., Department of Radiology & Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University), Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Department of Nuclear medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands., Prostate Cancer Network, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.