Validation of the Differential Cardiovascular Effects of the Antimuscarinic Agents Darifenacin and Tolterodine in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover Study


INTRODUCTION:Previous studies have demonstrated that antimuscarinics used for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), such as tolterodine and darifenacin, exert differential effects on heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV). OAB is a chronic symptomatic condition of high prevalence in older patients with cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities. Physicians prescribing these medications should take into consideration their specific effects on the parasympathetic control of the heart.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to detect if there was a difference between tolterodine and darifenacin in change from baseline in mean HR over 24 hours during once-daily administration of these compounds in healthy participants. The protocol was designed to confirm results from a previous study.

METHODS:This was a 3-way crossover, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in healthy participants of similar age to OAB patients (≥ 50 years). Participants were randomized to one of 6 possible treatment sequences and consecutively received once-daily tolterodine 4 mg, darifenacin 15 mg, and matched placebo for at least 7 days in separate treatment periods. Electrocardiogram monitoring (Holter) for 24 hours was used to assess changes in mean HR and HRV between treatment arms

RESULTS: Tolterodine but not darifenacin significantly increased mean HR over 24 hours compared with darifenacin (2.24 beats per minute [bpm], P = .0004) and placebo (1.84 bpm, P = .0037). In contrast, darifenacin did not significantly alter HR compared with placebo (–0.40, P = .5219). Overall, HRV over 24 hours decreased with tolterodine but not with darifenacin or placebo.

CONCLUSION: Tolterodine increased HR and reduced HRV compared with darifenacin and placebo in healthy participants aged ≥ 50 years. Because increased HR and decreased HRV are associated with increased CV risk and patients with OAB often have CV comorbidities, careful selection of antimuscarinic treatment for OAB patients may be warranted.

KEYWORDS: Antimuscarinic; Cardiovascular effects; M3 selectivity

CORRESPONDENCE: Brian Olshansky, MD, Professor of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals, 4426a JCP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA ().

CITATION: Urotoday Int J. 2009 Aug;2(4). doi:10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2009.08.07




The antimuscarinic drugs darifenacin and tolterodine are widely used in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), a common and chronic condition. The primary symptoms of OAB are urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence (usually in conjunction with increased urinary frequency and nocturia) and are associated with advancing age [1,2]. In a recent study, it was shown that these drugs had different effects on heart rate (HR) in healthy participants of age comparable to a typical OAB population [3]. Tolterodine increased mean 24-hour HR significantly compared with darifenacin (1.8 beats per minute [bpm]) or placebo (1.4 bpm) and increased the proportion of participants with an average increase in HR of ≥ 5 bpm. In contrast, darifenacin did not increase mean HR compared with placebo [3]. Furthermore, tolterodine reduced 24-hour HR variability (HRV) compared with either darifenacin or placebo, which did not differ significantly from each other [3].

Although increases of 2 to 5 bpm in mean HR may appear small, this change represents an average increase over 24 hours in healthy individuals and is similar to the difference in HR observed between physically trained and untrained (unfit) adults [4,5]. A number of studies have shown a close association of elevated resting HR with serious cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality [6,7,8]. Therefore, prolonged HR elevation poses a great risk, even with relatively small numeric changes[7,9,10,11]. Additionally sustained increases in HR over time may intensify risk [7].

Furthermore, a decrease in HRV is indicative of adverse changes in parasympathetic /sympathetic balance. In a large community-based population from the Framingham Heart Study, a decrease in HRV (as measured by the standard deviation [SD] of all normal–normal intervals [SDNN]) of 1 SD over 2 hours was associated with a 41% increase in risk of cardiac events, even after adjusting for mean HR and clinical variables [12]. The combination of changes in HR and HRV measurements, therefore, can provide a very powerful tool to identify CV risk.

In the previous study, tolterodine produced significant reductions in SDNN index compared with darifenacin in healthy volunteers [3]. The importance of these findings may have even greater significance in OAB patients, in whom a preexisting state of autonomic imbalance along with CV comorbidities and elevated resting HR may be common [13,14,15,16,17]. Because OAB may require long-term therapy, prolonged exposure to an agent that potentially increases HR, even by small amounts, should be an important consideration when selecting treatment for these patients. The observation that tolterodine but not darifenacin increased HR in a previous study warrants further investigation to demonstrate whether the results and trends detected can be reproduced. Here the authors report the results of a second study, designed to confirm the differential CV effects of these two commonly prescribed antimuscarinics. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to determine whether or not there was a difference between once-daily darifenacin and tolterodine in mean HR over 24 hours in healthy participants over 50 years of age. Secondary outcome measures included mean hourly HR, HRV, and pulse rate.


Study Design

This was a prospective, 3-way crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study of healthy participants ≥ 50 years of age. Eligible participants were randomly assigned in equal proportions to one of 6 possible treatment sequences Figure 1, using a computer-generated randomization list. The study investigator identified the appropriate study treatment for each participant using randomization numbers and visit numbers on the label of the study drug. All study personnel and participants were blinded to the identity of the drug throughout the study. Blinding was maintained using a double-dummy technique with matched placebos for darifenacin 15 mg tablets and tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg capsules; treatment compliance was assessed by pill counts and individual reporting.

The study ( identifier NCT00703703) was conducted in 18 centers across the US between May 2008 and October 2008 in compliance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, applicable local regulations, and ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, following approval of the protocol by a properly constituted Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee/Research Ethics Board. Participants each provided written informed consent.


The study population consisted of generally healthy men and women (age ≥ 50 years) with documented normal heart rhythm at screening and a body mass index of 18.5 to 35 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria included known or suspected allergy to tolterodine and/or darifenacin or their components, irregular day and night activity patterns (eg, night-shift workers), significant medical problems known to affect HR, or history of any malignancy within the past 5 years. Use of medications with a potential to affect HR were prohibited throughout the study, including calcium channel blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, ß-blockers, or thyroid hormone. Administration of medications with known anticholinergic side effects was prohibited throughout the study and within 4 weeks prior to study entry. Use of cholinergic agonists and cholinesterase inhibitors or medications with potential for pharmacokinetic interaction with the study drugs or P-glycoprotein was not permitted during the study or within 2 weeks of study entry.

Treatment and Assessments

Eligible participants received tolterodine ER 4 mg, darifenacin 15 mg, and placebo once daily for at least 7 days in 3 periods, each preceded by a 14-day washout period, to ensure a negligible risk of carryover effects between the treatment periods. Participants underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring and a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) after each washout to establish baseline values for the subsequent treatment period, thus providing 3 separate baselines. At steady state of each treatment period the following were assessed: 24-hour Holter monitoring (starting on Day 7), 12-lead ECG, sitting and orthostatic blood pressure, and pulse assessments (on Day 8). Tolerability and safety were monitored throughout the study based on adverse events (AEs; categorized for relationship to treatment), serious AEs (SAEs), treatment discontinuations, abnormal findings from ECG results, vital signs, and laboratory parameters recorded at each study visit.

Statistical Analysis

Using a one-sample two-sided paired t test at a two-sided significance level of 5%, and assuming an expected difference of 2 bpm in mean HR over 24 hours (a standard deviation of 5.1 bpm and 90% power), it was found that a total of 71 per protocol (PP) participants were required for the study. If it is assumed that about 25% of the randomized participants would be excluded from the PP population, then approximately 96 participants needed to be randomized.

The primary population for analysis of all primary and secondary CV endpoints was the PP population, defined as: all treated participants who completed at least 2 study periods, who were treated for at least 6 complete days in each study period, and who had no major protocol deviations. This population was selected for analyses of the CV endpoints because 7 days of treatment exposure were required to ensure steady-state conditions for the active treatments. Analyses of the primary endpoint and HRV endpoints were also carried out in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (randomized participants with baseline and post-baseline assessment within the same treatment period).

The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in mean 24-hour HR after 7-day exposure to tolterodine, darifenacin, or placebo. The primary analysis compared the difference between treatment groups in the primary outcome, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which included the effects of treatment, sequence, study period, and baseline mean HR over 24 hours as fixed effects and participants within sequences as random effect.

The overall treatment, period, and sequence effects were tested at 5% level of significance using a generalized F test that was generated using the procedure PROC MIXED, which is part of the SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A t test with two-sided alternative was performed at 5% level of significance to assess differences in change from baseline to Day 7 in mean HR between the treatments using the least-squares means estimate from the full model. As a supportive analysis, pairwise response data were used to statistically compare the percentage of participants with mean 24-hour HR increases of ≥ 5 or ≥ 10 bpm between tolterodine vs darifenacin, tolterodine vs placebo, and darifenacin vs placebo. These statistical comparisons were made using exact McNemar’s test at a two-sided significance level of 5%.

Secondary outcome measures were treatment differences in the change from baseline after 7 days of treatment for the following CV parameters after exposure to tolterodine or darifenacin, compared with placebo: mean hourly HR; mean HR at the time of anticipated maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of each drug; minimum and maximum HR over 24 hours; HRV over 24 hours; orthostatic blood pressure; pulse rate. Analyses of most of these secondary endpoints were conducted using ANCOVA models similar to the one described for the primary analysis variable. As was done for the primary analysis variable, fitted models were used for pairwise comparison of the 3 treatments. All tests were two-sided at 5% significance level.

Another secondary CV outcome measure that was analyzed was HRV over 24 hours. Median treatment differences with associated 95% confidence intervals and Wilcoxon signed-rank test-based P values were derived for the following pre-specified HRV parameters: standard deviation (SD) of all normal–normal intervals (SDNN), the mean of the SD of all the normal–normal intervals for all 5-minute segments (SDNN index), and the square root of the mean squared differences between adjacent normal–normal intervals (R-MSSD) [18]. It has been proposed that the SDNN index and R-MSSD correlate better with parasympathetic tone than the SDNN [19].

AEs were summarized by treatment for the safety population, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had any post-baseline safety assessments.



A total of 117 participants (50-86 years) were randomized to the 6 treatment groups Figure 1 and 111 completed treatment with darifenacin, tolterodine, and placebo, respectively. Overall, 108 patients completed all 3 study periods Figure 2. Most participants were less than 65 years of age (97/117, 82.9%), female (74/117, 63.2%) and Caucasian (103/117, 88.0%). Baseline (collected at the start of each phase) HR and blood pressure data were comparable and are summarized by treatment in Table 1, Part 1 and Table 1, Part 2.

CV Effects in the PP Population

The mean change from baseline in HR over 24 hours at steady state was significantly higher for tolterodine compared with darifenacin and compared with placebo, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between darifenacin and placebo (Table 2, Part 1; Table 2, Part 2). The treatment difference in adjusted mean change from baseline was an increase of 2.24 bpm (P = .0004) for tolterodine vs darifenacin and 1.84 bpm (P = .0037) for tolterodine vs placebo. The proportion of participants with an increase in mean 24-hour HR of ≥ 5 bpm with one therapy was not significantly greater after exposure to tolterodine compared with darifenacin or placebo Figure 3. Although not statistically significant, 5 participants had an increase in mean 24-hour HR of ≥ 10 bpm with tolterodine, compared with none during darifenacin treatment. In patients that had an increase in HR with either of the 2 pairs of therapies under consideration, the percentage of patients with an HR increase of ≥ 5 bpm was 15.7 vs 22.9 for tolterodine with darifenacin, respectively. For the comparison of tolterodine with placebo, the percentage was 25.0 vs 14.3. In contrast, for the comparison of darifenacin with placebo, the percentage was 15.7 vs 12.0.

Further post hoc categorical analyses by increases of single bpm (from ≥ 1 bpm to ≥ 10 bpm) confirmed that more participants had an increase in HR on tolterodine compared with darifenacin and placebo across the increments ≥ 1 to ≥ 3 bpm Figure 4, while similar numbers of participants on darifenacin compared with placebo had increases in HR across all increments. Conversely, a significantly greater proportion of participants receiving darifenacin had a decrease in HR of ≥ 1 to ≥ 3 bpm compared with those receiving tolterodine (P < .02; Figure 4. However, there was no statistically significant difference between darifenacin and placebo in the number of participants with decreases in HR of each 1 bpm increment.

Consistent with the findings for mean 24-hour HR, mean HR values recorded over consecutive 1-hour intervals were significantly higher with tolterodine than darifenacin and/or placebo at most hourly intervals from 5-17 hours post-dose Figure 5. This time period followed immediately after the anticipated time of maximum serum concentration of tolterodine (4 hours), based on the pharmacokinetic data from the US prescribing information for this product [20]. For the comparison of tolterodine with placebo, statistically significant differences were detected in most hourly intervals from 5-12 hours post-dose. Minimum and maximum HRs over 24 hours were comparable between the 3 treatments Table 2, Part 1.

Measurements of HRV over 24 hours after 7 days’ exposure showed a reduction with tolterodine but not darifenacin or placebo. Tolterodine was associated with significant reduction in SDNN index (P = .0087) and R-MSSD (P = .0011) compared with darifenacin and also in R-MSSD (P = .0219) when compared with placebo. Estimated median treatment differences are shown in Table 3. HRV did not differ between darifenacin and placebo using any of the 3 measures.

A significant increase in the pulse rate change when rising from the sitting to the standing position was observed with tolterodine when compared with darifenacin. In contrast, there was a significant reduction in pulse (change from sitting to first standing and change from sitting to mean standing) with darifenacin vs placebo Table 4.

There were no differences in orthostatic or sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure measurements between treatment groups.

Results of ITT Population Analysis

The ITT and PP populations were comparable among analyzed measures of mean HR over 24 hours and HRV parameters Table 2, Part 1 Table 3 confirming the relevance of the PP analysis.

Tolerability and Safety

AEs were reported by 23 participants when taking tolterodine (20.5%), 35 taking darifenacin (31.0%), and 21 taking placebo (18.4%). AEs reported by > 5% of participants were those commonly reported with all antimuscarinics, ie, constipation (0% tolterodine, 5.3% darifenacin, 1.8% placebo) and dry mouth (5.4%, 13.3%, 0.9%, respectively).

There was 1 SAE, a hypersensitivity reaction, reported during darifenacin treatment. A 54-year-old African-American male with a history of gonorrhea and taking nutritional supplements developed shortness of breath, tightness in the chest, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea after 2 doses of darifenacin treatment and was hospitalized. His ECG was normal upon admission. Study medication was discontinued and the participant was reported as completely recovered after 2 days. The investigator suspected a relationship with the study medication. Two additional participants experienced AEs while receiving placebo that led to discontinuation from the study: 1 participant experienced moderate dizziness and 1 participant experienced a mild episode of unsustained ventricular tachycardia. The investigator suspected that the 1 SAE and 2 AEs leading to discontinuation from the study were treatment-related. There were no clinically significant findings in hematology, biochemistry, or urinalysis and there were no obvious trends among treatments. There were no deaths during the study.

ECG evaluations for treated participants with evaluable baseline and post-baseline data (tolterodine n=112; darifenacin n=109; placebo n=112), showed a comparable incidence of newly occurring ECG findings between treatment groups. Newly occurring ECG abnormalities were seen in 10 (8.9%) participants during tolterodine treatment (first degree AV block [n=4]; depressed ST segment [n=1]; flat or inverted T waves [n=3]; sinus bradycardia [n=2]; atrial premature contractions [n=1]). Newly occurring ECG abnormalities were seen in 4 (3.7%) participants during darifenacin treatment (left anterior hemiblock [n=1]; depressed ST segment [n=1]; flat or inverted T waves [n=2]). Finally, newly occurring ECG abnormalities were seen in 10 (8.9%) participants while receiving placebo (first degree AV block [n=1]; left anterior hemiblock [n=2]; depressed ST segment [n=2]; flat or inverted T waves [n=3]; sinus bradycardia [n=1]; ectopic supraventricular rhythm [n=1]). The proportion of participants with newly occurring ECG interval changes was generally comparable between groups and no specific interval change was seen in ≥ 10% of participants during any study treatment. The most commonly reported newly occurring interval change (≥ 5% in any treatment group) was QTcB increase ≥ 30 msec (3.67% darifenacin, 6.25% tolterodine ER, 4.46% placebo). In addition, new PR intervals of > 200 msec and QTcF increases of ≥ 30 msec were seen in slightly higher proportions of participants during tolterodine ER treatment (3.57% tolterodine ER vs ≤ 0.92% for darifenacin and placebo).


Long-term follow-up studies have indicated that a higher HR is associated with an increase in all-cause mortality, CV disease, atrial fibrillation, and sudden death in patients with hypertension or known or suspected coronary heart disease, and in survivors of myocardial infarction [10,21,22,23]. Single-digit increases in average HR over prolonged periods have been associated with marked increases in mortality risk [11,24], even in normal participants [7]. Effects of therapeutic agents on HR may be of particular importance for patients with OAB, because CV comorbidities and elevated resting HR are known to be more common in this patient population [13,14,15,16,17]. In addition, the chronic nature of the condition requires long-term treatment, which is likely to increase the risk for emergence of cardiac effects or exacerbation of preexisting cardiac conditions.

The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial was to validate the findings from a previous study of the effects of tolterodine and darifenacin on HR parameters under steady-state conditions in healthy participants aged 50 years and older [3]. As in the previous study, tolterodine significantly increased mean HR over 24 hours compared with both darifenacin and placebo, while darifenacin did not affect HR compared with placebo. The differences between the effects of these antimuscarinics were statistically significant both in the present and previous studies [3].

Tolterodine caused an increase in mean hourly HR compared with darifenacin over time, with the differences being significantly greater during several of the hourly intervals from 5-17 hours post-dose. In the previous study, statistically significant differences were observed at several time points after only 2 hours post-dose, and tolterodine caused a peak increase in the mean hourly HR that coincided with its expected Tmax at approximately 4 hours. Despite using doses and treatment periods identical to the previous study, there was no clear association between peak increases in mean HR and expected drug Tmax in this study. The magnitude of HR changes was similar to the previous study but was sustained across a longer time period. These results could reflect a slight difference in the composition of the 2 populations regarding their ability to metabolize tolterodine; for example, participants who are poor metabolizers could prolong the time of exposure to maximal concentration and drug effects compared with good metabolizers [25]. However, neither study evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters; therefore, the influence of intrinsic differences between participants cannot be assessed.

As observed in the previous study, darifenacin did not show any consistent effect in the average hourly HR or 24-hour HRV compared with placebo. In both studies, tolterodine consistently increased HR and decreased HRV parameters compared with darifenacin and placebo. There were no significant changes in HR or HRV observed with darifenacin, but an increased propensity for decreases in HR was observed. A significantly greater number of participants receiving darifenacin had decreases in HR of ≥ 1 to ≥ 3 bpm than participants receiving tolterodine. However, the comparison between darifenacin and placebo was not statistically significant. Reductions in HR are known to decrease mortality [7]; however, the clinical relevance of the decreases observed in these studies is not known.

Further observation across the two studies included pulse rate and blood pressure changes. In the first study, neither antimuscarinic affected systolic or diastolic blood pressure with the exception of a small change observed with darifenacin in diastolic blood pressure in the sitting position only-an observation that was not repeated in the second study. In the second study, darifenacin was shown to significantly reduce pulse (from sitting to first standing and from sitting to mean standing) compared with placebo, which may suggest that darifenacin has a beneficial effect on vagal response.

The effect of tolterodine on HR was accompanied by reductions in 2 HRV parameters (SDNN index and R-MSSD) that reflect parasympathetic influences, when compared with darifenacin. The effects on HRV, and in particular R-MSSD, were consistent with blockade of parasympathetic influences over the HR. HRV is a potentially more powerful predictor of sudden cardiac death than HR alone [26]. Indeed, in the Framingham Heart Study, HRV was identified as a highly significant predictor of CV events and mortality in the overall community-based population and in an elderly subset (mean age 72 years) [12,27]. In this subset, HRV was a powerful predictor of CV risk and mortality and a 1 SD decrement was associated with a 70% increase in all-cause mortality (41% increase in the overall population) [12,27]. Therefore, HRV may be even more sensitive in detecting autonomic imbalance than mean HR [12].

In view of the high level of consistency between the results from these 2 studies of antimuscarinic effect on HR in healthy participants, it is likely that similar effects would be observed in patients with OAB. Importantly, the prevalence of preexisting CV diseases in an OAB population has been reported to be 47%, including hypertension in 36% of patients [16]. Elevated resting HR of ≥ 80 bpm was recorded in 39% of patients prior to antimuscarinic therapy [15]. In view of the high average age and prevalence of preexisting CV conditions in the OAB population, the possibility that an antimuscarinic drug may increase HR and reduce HRV is concerning. However, further studies on differential CV effects of antimuscarinics in patients with OAB are warranted.

The reasons for the differential CV effects of tolterodine and darifenacin may be related to their muscarinic receptor selectivity. Darifenacin has shown 59-fold selectivity in binding to the M3 receptor over the M2 subtype, while in the same study tolterodine displayed only 3.6-fold selectivity [28]. The higher selectivity of darifenacin for the M3 receptor, thought to be responsible for detrusor muscle contraction in the bladder, is expected to spare the overwhelming majority of cholinergic M2 receptors present in the sinus node. In contrast, antimuscarinics with significant M2 receptor affinity can block the post-junctional effects of cardiac parasympathetic tone, resulting in decreased HRV and increased mean average diurnal HR [17,28,29].

The present study has several strengths. First, the robust 3-way crossover design ensured that study participants served as their own control, reducing the problem of between-group differences and making the study efficient by reducing sample size. Second, the study population was comparable in age and gender to typical OAB patient populations [2,30,31]. Third, rigorous study inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured that intersubject variability was minimized. Fourth, Holter monitoring was used to measure HR during 24 hours. This provided mean diurnal values instead of the spot measurements that are generally used in practice, but which are only reflective of short observation periods. The use of Holter monitoring helped ensure objectivity and safety in the assessment of the HR by detecting all events occurring within the 24-hour period of observation. Some cardiac events could be difficult to detect using routine ECG, due to their often limited duration and irregular occurrence [32].

A potential limitation of the study was the population of generally healthy participants. However, it is reasonable to expect that cardiac treatment effects observed in healthy participants would also occur in OAB patients because these participants were of similar age to the OAB population. Indeed, tolterodine-treated OAB patients showed an increase in pulse rate or mean HR in previous studies [33,34,35]. In addition, assessing these CV parameters in healthy participants minimizes confounding factors such as CV comorbidities and drug to drug interaction, increasing the ability of this study to discern pharmacological effects of the studied medications.

It remains to be seen whether this differential in pharmacologic effect is also seen with other antimuscarinic agents and whether any effects are related to their muscarinic receptor selectivity profile. Currently, only limited prospectively evaluated HR data are available. These data are mainly from cardiac safety studies evaluating each agent individually. For example, in one such study, 39.1% of participants given 4 mg/day fesoterodine and 76.5% given supratherapeutic doses of 28 mg/day fesoterodine experienced HR increases of > 25% and HR over 100 bpm, compared with 16.9% on placebo [35]. Similarly, the nonselective antimuscarinic drug, trospium, at 20 mg twice daily increased HR in healthy participants by 9.1 bpm [36]. In contrast, studies with oxybutynin or solifenacin, which have demonstrated intermediate selectivity for the M3 over M2 receptors [37] have revealed either a small decrease or no change in HR [38,39].


The results of the present study substantiate prior evidence that the antimuscarinic drugs darifenacin and tolterodine differ with respect to their effects on HR. Differences are likely related to their muscarinic receptor binding profiles, specifically, their selectivity for M3 receptors over M2 receptors. The relatively nonselective muscarinic blocker, tolterodine, significantly increased HR and reduced HRV compared with placebo whereas the more M3-selective blocker, darifenacin, did not. Based on these data, careful consideration should be given to the selection of the antimuscarinic drug used to treat patients with OAB.


The authors would like to thank the staff of the centers involved in this work, Susan Facchinei and the clinical trial team for their expert collaboration, and the study participants. Funding for this study was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals. Funding for the editorial and project management services of ACUMED® in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Novartis Pharma AG. The authors would also like to thank Jessica Colon (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation) and Mary Goodsell (ACUMED®) for their contribution to the development of this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Brian Olshansky: Paid consultant to sponsor
Egilius LH Spierings: Funded by sponsor through research grants
José Brum: Employee of sponsor (Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals Inc.)
Lidia Mongay: Employee of sponsor (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation)
Mathias Egermark: Employee of sponsor (Novartis Pharma AG)
Yodit Seifu: Employee of sponsor (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation)


  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-178. 
  2. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1306-1314. 
  3. Olshansky B, Ebinger U, Brum J, Egermark M, Viegas A, Rekeda L. Differential pharmacological effects of antimuscarinic drugs on heart rate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study with tolterodine and darifenacin in healthy participants > or = 50 years old. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2008;13(4):241-251. 
  4. Lazoglu AH, Glace B, Gleim GW, Coplan NL. Exercise and heart rate variability. Am Heart J. 1996;131(4):825-826. 
  5. Sinyor D, Golden M, Steinert Y, Seraganian P. Experimental manipulation of aerobic fitness and the response to psychosocial stress: heart rate and self-report measures. Psychosom Med. 1986;48(5):324-337. 
  6. Mensink GB, Hoffmeister H. The relationship between resting heart rate and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(9):1404-1410. 
  7. Jouven X, Empana JP, Escolano S, et al. Relation of heart rate at rest and long-term (>20 years) death rate in initially healthy middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103(2):279-283. 
  8. Hsia J, Larson JC, Ockene JK, et al. Resting heart rate as a low tech predictor of coronary events in women: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b219. 
  9. Gopinathannair R, Martins JB. Predicting sudden cardiac death in healthy humans: is there more to autonomic balance than we know? Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(2):306-307. 
  10. Fox K, Borer JS, Camm AJ, et al. Resting heart rate in cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(9):823-830. 
  11. Hozawa A, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al. Prognostic value of home heart rate for cardiovascular mortality in the general population: the Ohasama study. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17(11 Pt 1):1005-1010. 
  12. Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ Jr, et al. Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1996;94(11):2850-2855. 
  13. Hubeaux K, Deffieux X, Ismael SS, Raibaut P, Amarenco G. Autonomic nervous system activity during bladder filling assessed by heart rate variability analysis in women with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome or stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2483-2487. 
  14. Choi JB, Kim YB, Kim BT, Kim YS. Analysis of heart rate variability in female patients with overactive bladder. Urology. 2005;65(6):1109-1113. 
  15. Andersson KE, Kahler K, Ebinger U. Heart rates in OAB patients prior to initiation of treatment with antimuscarinics [abstract 41]. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:654-655.
  16. Andersson KE, Kahler K, Ebinger U. Prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in patients treated with antimuscarinics for overactive bladder (OAB) [abstract 40]. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:653-654.
  17. Andersson KE, Olshansky B. Treating patients with overactive bladder syndrome with antimuscarinics: heart rate considerations. BJU Int. 2007;100(5):1007-1014. 
  18. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology [no authors listed]. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043-1065. 
  19. Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Correlations among time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability two weeks after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69(9):891-898. 
  20. Pfizer. Detrol® LA (tolterodine tartrate extended release capsules). US Prescribing Information. LAB-0257-8.0, March 2008. Available at: Accessed July 10, 2009.
  21. Habib G. Reappraisal of the importance of heart rate as a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clin Ther. 1997;19 Suppl A:39-52.
  22. Lanza GA, Fox K, Crea F. Heart rate: a risk factor for cardiac diseases and outcomes? Pathophysiology of cardiac diseases and the potential role of heart rate slowing. Adv Cardiol. 2006;43:1-16. 
  23. Okin PM, Wachtell K, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Relation to Changing Heart Rate Over Time in Hypertensive Patients: The LIFE Study. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2008;1:337-343. 
  24. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Mercando AD, Epstein S. Association of average heart rate on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms with incidence of new coronary events at 48-month follow-up in 1,311 patients (mean age 81 years) with heart disease and sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(10):1175-1176. 
  25. Brynne N, Dalen P, Alvan G, Bertilsson L, Gabrielsson J. Influence of CYP2D6 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic of tolterodine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;63(5):529-539. 
  26. Lahiri MK, Kannankeril PJ, Goldberger JJ. Assessment of autonomic function in cardiovascular disease: physiological basis and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(18):1725-1733. 
  27. Tsuji H, Venditti FJ Jr, Manders ES, et al. Reduced heart rate variability and mortality risk in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;90(2):878-883.
  28. Napier C, Gupta P. Darifenacin is selective for the human recombinant M3 receptor subtype [abstract 445]. Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society. 2002; Heidelberg, Germany. Available at: Accessed July 10, 2009.
  29. Stevens LA, Chapple CR, Chess-Williams R. Human idiopathic and neurogenic overactive bladders and the role of M2 muscarinic receptors in contraction. Eur Urol. 2007;52(2):531-538. 
  30. Milsom I, Abrams P, Cardozo L, Roberts RG, Thuroff J, Wein AJ. How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int. 2001;87(9):760-766 
  31. Stewart W, Herzog R, Wein A, et al. Prevalence and impact of overactive bladder in the US: results from the NOBLE program. Neurourol Urodyn. 2001;20(4):406-408.
  32. Kowey PR, Kocovic DZ. Cardiology patient pages. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Circulation. 2003;108:e31-e33. 
  33. Olshansky B, Foote J, Arguinzoniz M, et al. The effects of darifenacin and tolterodine on heart rate (HR) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) [abstract 124]. Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society. 2006; Christchurch, New Zealand. Available at: Accessed July 10, 2009.
  34. Rentzhog L, Stanton SL, Cardozo L, Nelson E, Fall M, Abrams P. Efficacy and safety of tolterodine in patients with detrusor instability: a dose-ranging study. Br J Urol. 1998;81(1):42-48. 
  35. European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report. 2007. Available at: Accessed July 17, 2009.
  36. Indevus Pharmaceuticals. Sanctura (Trospium chloride 20 mg tablets). Prescribing Information. December, 2006. Available at: Accessed July 17, 2009.
  37. Ikeda K, Kobayashi S, Suzuki M, et al. M3 receptor antagonism by the novel antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in the urinary bladder and salivary gland. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2002;366(2):97-103. 
  38. Hussain RM, Hartigan-Go K, Thomas SHL, Ford GA. Effect of oxybutynin on the QTc interval in elderly patients with urinary incontinence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;41(1):73-75. 
  39. Yamanouchi Pharma America Inc. VESIcare® (solifenacin succinate). US Prescribing Information. November, 2008. Available at: Accessed July 10, 2009.