Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Case Report With Review of the Literature - Supplement

As part of an added supplement, we at UroToday International Journal present the following added information regarding the article "Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Case Report With Review of the Literature." Reponses are provided by corresponding author Dr. Gajanan Bhat. 

Q. What does your contribution add to the present knowledge? What's essential to understand about in terms of clinical practice? 

A. The most important thing in a clinical practice is the proper clinical examination. In our case, the patient was being treated for primary amenorrhea by various clinicians purely based on some lab reports bypassing the clinical examination. Hence the diagnosis was delayed. Here I would like to emphasize the importance of clinical examination.

Q. Will this replace existing techniques or therapies now or in the near future? Will it impact the standard of care?

A. The case report is not aimed at changing the present standard of care at all. Hence the question doesn't arise.

Q. What are the three things that this technology does or enables that I should know to impact clinical practice? What's your take-home message for me as your colleague? 

A. My take-home message is very clear: No investigation can substitute proper clinical examination. Never attempt a shortcut in clinical practice.

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe