The European Randomised Study of Prostate Cancer Screening has shown a 21% relative reduction in prostate cancer mortality at 13 years. The causes of death can be misattributed, particularly in elderly men with multiple comorbidities, and therefore accurate assessment of the underlying cause of death is crucial for valid results. To address potential unreliability of end-point assessment, and its possible impact on mortality results, we analysed the study outcome adjudication data in six countries.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
Latent class statistical models were formulated to compare the accuracy of individual adjudicators, and to assess whether accuracy differed between the trial arms. We used the model to assess whether correcting for adjudication inaccuracies might modify the study results.
There was some heterogeneity in adjudication accuracy of causes of death, but no consistent differential accuracy by trial arm. Correcting the estimated screening effect for misclassification did not alter the estimated mortality effect of screening.
Our findings were consistent with earlier reports on the European screening trial. Observer variation, while demonstrably present, is unlikely to have materially biased the main study results. A bias in assigning causes of death that might have explained the mortality reduction by screening can be effectively ruled out.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication 17 November 2016; doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.378 www.bjcancer.com.
British journal of cancer. 2016 Nov 17 [Epub ahead of print]
Stephen D Walter, Harry J de Koning, Jonas Hugosson, Kirsi Talala, Monique J Roobol, Sigrid Carlsson, Marco Zappa, Vera Nelen, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Álvaro Páez, Sue Moss, Anssi Auvinen, ERSPC Cause of Death Committees
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, CRL 233, 1280 Main Street, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1., Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands., Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska universitetssjukhuset, Bruna stråket 11b v 2 su/sahlgrenska, 41345 Göteborg, Sweden., Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Unioninkatu 22, FI-00130 Helsinki, Finland., ISPO-Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, Via delle Oblate 2, 50141 Florence, Italy., Provinciaal Instituut Voor Hygiëne (Labo's), Kronenburgstraat 45, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium., Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland., Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino 2, 28942 FUENLABRADA (Madrid), Spain., Wolfson Institute, St Mary University, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK., School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland.