[(18)F]Fluciclovine PET imaging shows promise for the assessment of prostate cancer. The purpose of this PET/MRI study is to optimise the PET imaging protocol for detection and characterisation of primary prostate cancer, by quantitative evaluation of the dynamic uptake of [(18)F]Fluciclovine in cancerous and benign tissue.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
Patients diagnosed with high-risk primary prostate cancer underwent an integrated [(18)F]Fluciclovine PET/MRI exam before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Volumes-of-interest (VOIs) of selected organs (prostate, bladder, blood pool) and sub-glandular prostate structures (tumour, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), inflammation, healthy tissue) were delineated on T2-weighted MR images, using whole-mount histology samples as a reference. Three candidate windows for optimal PET imaging were identified based on the dynamic curves of the mean and maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax, respectively). The statistical significance of differences in SUV between VOIs were analysed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests (p<0.05, adjusted for multiple testing).
Twenty-eight (28) patients [median (range) age: 66 (55-72) years] were included. An early (W1: 5-10 minutes post-injection) and two late candidate windows (W2: 18-23; W3: 33-38 minutes post-injection) were selected. Late compared with early imaging was better able to distinguish between malignant and benign tissue [W3, SUVmean: tumour vs. BPH 2.5 vs. 2.0 (p<0.001), tumour vs. inflammation 2.5 vs. 1.7 (p<0.001), tumour vs. healthy tissue 2.5 vs. 2.0 (p<0.001); W1, SUVmean: tumour vs. BPH 3.1 vs. 3.1 (p=0.771), tumour vs inflammation 3.1 vs. 2.2 (p=0.021), tumour vs. healthy tissue 3.1 vs. 2.5 (p<0.001)] as well as between high-grade and low/intermediate-grade tumours (W3, SUVmean: 2.6 vs. 2.1 (p=0.040); W1, SUVmean: 3.1 vs. 2.8 (p=0.173)). These differences were relevant to the peripheral zone, but not the central gland.
Late-window [(18)F]Fluciclovine PET imaging shows promise for distinguishing between prostate tumours and benign tissue and for assessment of tumour aggressiveness.
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2016 Nov 05 [Epub ahead of print]
Mattijs Elschot, Kirsten M Selnæs, Elise Sandsmark, Brage Krüger-Stokke, Øystein Størkersen, May-Britt Tessem, Siver A Moestue, Helena Bertilsson, Tone F Bathen
Deparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. ., Deparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway., Department of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway., Department of Urology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.