OBJECTIVE - The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with low-grade prostate cancer.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
MATERIALS AND METHODS - The study included a nationwide population-based cohort in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, of 7608 men with clinically localized, biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer who underwent immediate or delayed RP in 1997-2007.
Multivariable models compared RP pathology, use of salvage radiotherapy and prostate cancer mortality based on timing of RP (< 1, 1-2 or >2 years after diagnosis). Median follow-up was 8.1 years.
RESULTS - Men undergoing RP more than 2 years after diagnosis had a higher risk of Gleason upgrading [odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.34-3.68] and an increased risk of salvage radiotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.90, 95% CI 1.41-2.55], but no significant increase in prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.57-5.99). In competing risk analysis, 7 year prostate cancer-specific cumulative mortality was similar, at less than 1%, for immediate RP and active surveillance regardless of later intervention. Limitations of this study include the lack of data on follow-up biopsies and the limited follow-up time.
CONCLUSIONS - Men undergoing RP more than 2 years after diagnosis had more adverse pathological features and second line therapy, highlighting the trade-off in deferring immediate curative therapy. However, men with delayed RP constitute a minority with higher risk cancer among the much larger group of low-risk men initially surveilled, and the overall risk of prostate cancer mortality at 7 years was similarly low with immediate RP or active surveillance.
Scandinavian journal of urology. 2016 Apr 12 [Epub ahead of print]
Stacy Loeb, Yasin Folkvaljon, David Robinson, Danil V Makarov, Ola Bratt, Hans Garmo, Pär Stattin
a New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center , New York , NY , USA ;, b Regional Cancer Centre Uppsala Örebro, Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden ;, c Department of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology , Umeå University Hospital , Umeå , Sweden ;, a New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center , New York , NY , USA ;, e Department of Urology, CamPARI Clinic , Addenbrooke's Hospital , Cambridge , UK ;, g Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies , King's College London , London , UK ;, c Department of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology , Umeå University Hospital , Umeå , Sweden ;