OBJECTIVE - To determine the risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) versus the competing risk of mortality by other causes (MOC) in patients with localised prostate cancer (LPC) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
MATERIALS AND METHODS - An observational cohort study of 982 patients with LPC treated with RP selected from our department's PC registry database. A competing risk analysis was performed, calculating the probability of CSM in the presence of the competing risk of MOC. Cumulative incidence curves were constructed, and point estimates were performed at 5, 10 and 15 years. The analysis was stratified by age (≤65 vs. >65 years) and risk group: low (Gleason score ≤6 and pT2abc); intermediate (Gleason score of 7 and pT2abc) and high (Gleason score of 8-10 or pT3ab).
RESULTS - With a median follow-up of 60 months, the overall probability of dying from PC was 3.5%, and the probability of dying from other causes was 9%. A competing effect for MOC was observed. The risk of MOC was almost 3 times greater than that of CSM. This effect remained for all risk groups, although its magnitude decreased progressively according to the risk group level. At 10 years, CSM was only 0%, 1% and 2% for the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively, while the likelihood of MOC was 4%, 4% and 10%, respectively. The mortality risk was shown after 10years of follow-up and was higher for other causes not attributable to PC and for patients older than 65years.
CONCLUSIONS - The benefit of RP might be overestimated, given that the risk of MOC is greater than that of CSM, regardless of the age group and risk group, especially after 10years of follow-up. The only parameter that varied was the magnitude of the CSM/MOC ratio. This information could help in choosing the active treatment for patients with LPC and short life expectancies.
Actas urologicas espanolas. 2016 Mar 22 [Epub ahead of print]
J L Ruiz-Cerdá, A Soto-Poveda, S Luján-Marco, A Loras-Monfort, M Trassierra-Villa, R Rogel-Bertó, F Boronat-Tormo
Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España. Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Manises, Manises, Valencia, España., Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España., Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Nanomedicina y Sensores, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España., Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España., Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España., Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España.