Anger is a common reaction to cancer diagnosis which may impact patients' perceptions of their prognosis and goals of care. This study tested the hypothesis that men with prostate cancer who are anger prone are pessimistic regarding their cancer prognosis.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
Two hundred and twelve men with a history of prostate cancer completed measures of personality traits, their prostate cancer prognosis, and their perception of their doctor's assessment of their prognosis. Anger proneness was operationally defined by the presence of high levels (ie, above the medians) of neuroticism and disagreeableness.
One in 4 men with prostate cancer disagreed with their doctor about prognosis. Anger-prone participants endorsed more pessimistic perceptions of prognosis (P = .041). This significant association was maintained after accounting for potential confounders.
Greater attention paid to patient anger regulation style and pessimistic perceptions will improve discussions about prognosis and goals of care among men with prostate cancer. Given recent calls for wider distress screening and earlier palliative care intervention in cancer settings, providers have an unprecedented opportunity to assess and respond to anger in the clinical setting. Communication could be improved through empathic statements that convey realistic optimism when appropriate, a commitment to the patient-provider relationship and a willingness to explore and address patient needs.
The American journal of hospice & palliative care. 2016 Feb 27 [Epub ahead of print]
James Gerhart, Eric Schmidt, Teresa Lillis, Sean O'Mahony, Paul Duberstein, Michael Hoerger
Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA ., Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), HSR&D, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA Stanford Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA., Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA., Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA., Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA., Department of Psychology, Tulane Cancer Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.