Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results Using a Panel of Plasma and Urine Biomarkers Combined in a Scoring System

BACKGROUND - Determining the need for prostate biopsy is frequently difficult and more objective criteria are needed to predict the presence of high grade prostate cancer (PCa). To reduce the rate of unnecessary biopsies, we explored the potential of using biomarkers in urine and plasma to develop a scoring system to predict prostate biopsy results and the presence of high grade PCa.

METHODS - Urine and plasma specimens were collected from 319 patients recommended for prostate biopsies. We measured the gene expression levels of UAP1, PDLIM5, IMPDH2, HSPD1, PCA3, PSA, TMPRSS2, ERG, GAPDH, B2M, AR, and PTEN in plasma and urine. Patient age, serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) level, and biomarkers data were used to develop two independent algorithms, one for predicting the presence of PCa and the other for predicting high-grade PCa (Gleason score [GS] ≥7).

RESULTS - Using training and validation data sets, a model for predicting the outcome of PCa biopsy was developed with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 87% and 63%, respectively. We then developed a second algorithm to identify patients with high-grade PCa (GS ≥7). This algorithm's AUROC was 0.80, and had a PPV and NPV of 56% and 77%, respectively. Patients who demonstrated concordant results using both algorithms showed a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 93% for predicting high-grade aggressive PCa. Thus, the use of both algorithms resulted in a PPV of 90% and NPV of 89% for predicting high-grade PCa with toleration of some low-grade PCa (GS <7) being detected.

CONCLUSIONS - This model of a biomarker panel with algorithmic interpretation can be used as a "liquid biopsy" to reduce the need for unnecessary tissue biopsies, and help to guide appropriate treatment decisions.

Journal of Cancer. 2016 Feb 02*** epublish ***

Maher Albitar, Wanlong Ma, Lars Lund, Ferras Albitar, Kevin Diep, Herbert A Fritsche, Neal Shore

1. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Irvine, CA;, 1. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Irvine, CA;, 2. Departments of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark;, 1. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Irvine, CA;, 1. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Irvine, CA;, 3. Health Discovery Corporation, Savanah, Georgia;, 4. Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.


Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.