AIMS AND OBJECTIVES - To develop a patient decision aid and to prepare an overview of requirements for implementation.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
BACKGROUND - We developed a decision aid that fits the preferences of patients and health care professionals to ensure adequate uptake in clinical practice.
DESIGN - A participatory design approach was used to acquire insight into preferences regarding the content and design of a decision aid and into barriers and aspects of the decision aid that facilitate implementation in clinical practice.
METHODS - Three focus group interviews with patients, their partners and health care professionals were conducted. A prototype of the decision aid was developed and presented to patients (n = 14) and health care professionals (n = 13) in semi-structured interviews. Patients (n = 5) participated in a usability study. Data were analysed by two independent coders.
RESULTS - Health care professionals considered medical information on treatments and side effects as the most important aspect to be included in the decision aid. Patients also focused on nonmedical considerations, such as location. Both expected the decision aid to support patients in making a treatment choice. According to health care professionals, the oncology nurse was the most suitable to discuss the decision aid with patients, while some patients preferred to discuss the patient decision aid with the urologist. The main barrier to implementation of the decision aid was said to be the expectation that it is time and money consuming, while the incorporation of the decision aid into clinical guidelines and basing the content on these guidelines, would promote implementation.
CONCLUSIONS - By using a participatory design approach a patient decision aid was designed to meet patients' and health care professionals' needs. Insight was also gained on requirements for implementation.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE - Wide-scale implementation of decision aids is desirable. An overview is provided of requirements for implementation to successfully incorporate a decision aid into clinical practice.
Journal of clinical nursing. 2016 Feb 16 [Epub ahead of print]
Hoda Hm Al-Itejawi, Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan, André N Vis, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen, Myrna Ja Hofstee, Reindert Jeroen A van Moorselaar, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. , Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.