CONTEXT - Radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography has changed the management of prostate cancer patients. However, new emerging radiopharmaceutical agents, like radiolabelled prostate specific membrane antigen, and new promising hybrid imaging will begin new challenges in the diagnostic field.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
OBJECTIVE - The continuous evolution in nuclear medicine has led to the improvement in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa), particularly distant metastases. New horizons have been opened for radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage therapy or for the assessment of systemic therapies. In addition, new tracers and imaging tools have been recently tested, providing important information for the management of PCa patients. Herein we discuss: (1) the available evidence in literature on radiolabelled choline PET and their recent indications, (2) the role of alternative radiopharmaceutical agents, and (3) the advantages of a recent hybrid imaging device (PET/magnetic resonance imaging) in PCa.
EVIDENCE AQUISITION - Data from recently published (2010-2015), original articles concerning the role of choline PET/CT, new emerging radiotracers, and a new imaging device are analysed. This review is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS - In the restaging phase, the detection rate of choline PET varies between 4% and 97%, mainly depending on the site of recurrence and prostate-specific antigen levels. Both 68gallium (68Ga)-prostate specific membrane antigen and 18F-fluciclovine are shown to be more accurate in the detection of recurrent disease as compared with radiolabelled choline PET/CT. Particularly, Ga68-PSMA has a detection rate of 50% and 68%, respectively for prostate-specific antigen levels < 0. 5ng/ml and 0. 5-2ng/ml. Moreover, 68Ga- PSMA PET/magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a particularly higher accuracy in detecting PCa than PET/CT. New tracers, such as radiolabelled bombesin or urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, are promising, but few data in clinical practice are available today.
CONCLUSIONS - Some limitations emerge from the published papers, both for radiolabelled choline PET/CT and also for new radiopharmaceutical agents. Efforts are still needed to enhance the impact of published data in the world of oncology, in particular when new radiopharmaceuticals are introduced into the clinical arena.
PATIENT SUMMARY - In the present review, the authors summarise the last evidences in clinical practice for the assessment of prostate cancer, by using nuclear medicine modalities, like positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
European urology. 2016 Feb 02 [Epub ahead of print]
Laura Evangelista, Alberto Briganti, Stefano Fanti, Stephen Joniau, Sven Reske, Riccardo Schiavina, Christian Stief, George N Thalmann, Maria Picchio
Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy. Department of Urology, Vita-Salute University San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. , Service of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. , Department of Urology, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium. , Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany. , Department of Urology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Italy. , Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany. , Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland. , Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.