INTRODUCTION - We characterized false negative prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reporting by using histology derived from MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal (MTTP) fusion biopsies.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
METHODS - In total, 148 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed.
Men underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), reported by a consultant/attending radiologist in line with European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standards. MTTP biopsy of the lesions was performed according to the Ginsburg recommendations. Cases with an MRI-histology mismatch were identified and underwent a second read by an experienced radiologist. A third review was performed with direct histology comparison to determine a true miss from an MRI-occult cancer. Statistical analysis was performed with McNemar's test.
RESULTS - False negative lesions were identified in 29 MRI examinations (19. 6%), with a total of 46 lesions. Most false negative lesions (21/46) were located in the anterior sectors of the prostate. The second read led to a significant decrease of false-negative lesions with 7/29 further studies identified as positive on a patient-by-patient basis (24. 1% of studies, p = 0. 016) and 11/46 lesions (23. 9%; p = 0. 001). Of these, 30 lesions following the first read and 23 lesions after the second read were considered significant cancer according to the University College London criteria. However, on direct comparison with histology, most lesions were MRI occult.
CONCLUSIONS - We demonstrate that MRI can fail to detect clinically relevant lesions. Improved results were achieved with a second read but despite this, a number of lesions remain MRI-occult. Further advances in imaging are required to reduce false negative results.
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada. 2015 Dec 14 [Epub]
Eva M Serrao, Tristan Barrett, Karan Wadhwa, Deepak Parashar, Julia Frey, Brendan C Koo, Anne Y Warren, Andrew Doble, Christof Kastner, Ferdia A Gallagher
Department of Radiology, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal, and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge and Cancer Research, Cambridge, UK;, Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;, Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;, Cancer Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK;, Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;, Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;, Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital. , Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;, Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;, Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK;; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;