The aim of this study is to compare two different preparations in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsies samples (TPBS) and assess the prevalence of genitourinary infections (GUI).
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
A historical cohort of patients undergoing TBPS for suspected prostate cancer.
Two groups were compared: one with endorectal lubricant jelly and another with the addition of a povidone-iodine lubricating jelly. Complications were evaluated at three weeks. A bivariate analysis was performed by calculating the OR (95 % CI) to determine if the additional endorectal povidone-iodine pre-TBPS reduced GUI and other complications.
185 patients (Group I n = 86, Group II n = 96) were evaluated. 45 and 25 % had genitourinary tract infection (OR: 0. 4, CI: 0. 2-0. 9, p = 0. 004); fever was presented in 21 and 10 % respectively (OR: 0. 42, CI: 0. 1-0. 9, p = 0. 04).
A reduction was observed in the presence of genitourinary infections in patients who had intrarectal povidone-iodine preparation applied.
Abstract available from the publisher.
Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. 0000 [Epub]
Jorge Moreno-Palacios, Alejandro Espinosa-Guerrero, Juan Ramón Torres-Anguiano, Guillermo Montoya-Martínez, Virgilio López-Samano, Eduardo Serrano-Brambila
Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Distrito Federal, México.