BACKGROUND: Three randomized trials demonstrated that post-prostatectomy adjuvant radiotherapy improves biochemical disease-free survival for patients with adverse pathologic features, and 1 trial found adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
We sought to determine whether post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT) utilization changed after publication of the survival benefit in March 2009.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2004 to 2011 who met criteria for enrollment in the randomized trials (positive margins and/or pT3-4 disease at radical prostatectomy). Joinpoint regression identified inflection points in PPRT utilization. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with PPRT recommendation.
RESULTS: Of 35,361 men, 5104 (14.4%) received a recommendation for PPRT. In joinpoint regression, 2009 was the inflection point in PPRT utilization. In multivariable analysis, PPRT recommendations were more likely after March 2009 than before 15.8% vs. 13.5%, adjusted odds ratio (AOR; 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.16; P = .008), in men with pT3 (vs. pT2, AOR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.53-3.11; P < .001), pT4 (vs. pT2 AOR, 4.62; 95% CI, 3.85-5.54; P < .001), or margin positive (AOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.34-1.58; P < .001) disease and in men who were younger (per year decrease, AOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03; P < .001), married (AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19; P = .01), or lived in metropolitan areas (AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.47; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: PPRT recommendations increased after the reporting of a survival benefit in March 2009, but absolute utilization rates remain low, suggesting that the oncologic community remains unconvinced that PPRT is needed for most patients with adverse features. Further work is needed to identify patients who might benefit most from PPRT.
Mahal BA, Hoffman KE, Efstathiou JA, Nguyen PL. Are you the author?
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Reference: Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Dec 9. pii: S1558-7673(14)00265-1.