OBJECTIVE: To validate the biological and prognostic value of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 (TGP5) in patients with Gleason score 7 (GS 7) prostate cancer (PCa) and to develop a prognostic model to identify the high-risk group of patients with TGP5.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 4,146 patients with localized (pT2-3 N0 M0) GS 7 PCa treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) without adjuvant therapy. The primary end point was biochemical recurrence (BCR), and the secondary one was to build a bootstrap-corrected multivariable Cox model.
RESULTS: Of the 4,146 patients, 416 (10%) had a TPG5 in the RP specimen. TGP5 was associated with BCR in both univariable and multivariable analyses that adjusted for the effects of standard pathological features (P< 0.001). A prognostic model based on preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels (< 10 vs.≥10ng/ml), primary and secondary Gleason pattern (3+4 vs. 4+3), pathological tumor category (pT2/pT3a vs. pT3b), and surgical margin status (R0 vs. R+) stratified patients with a discrimination of 72.2%. Patients in the low-risk group had a 5-year BCR-free survival rate of 76.3% compared with only 18.5% for those in the high-risk group (P< 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of TGP5 improves our prognostication of patients with GS 7 PCa treated with RP. We developed a statistical tool to help identify the patients with TGP5 who are at the highest risk of BCR after RP, thereby helping with the clinical decision making regarding adjuvant trials and follow-up scheduling.
Lucca I, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, Montorsi F, Remzi M, Seitz C, Fajkovic H, Klingler C, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Rouprêt M, Loidl W, Pummer K, Klatte T. Are you the author?
Institution(s): See publishing journal.
Reference: Urol Oncol. 2014 Oct 23. pii: S1078-1439(14)00289-0.