PURPOSE: Radioactive seed orientations are usually ignored in clinical brachytherapy dosimetry for prostate implants.
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
Associated with the anisotropic dose distribution of seeds, these orientations could cause dose differences between the planning configurations and the clinical postplanning dosimetry. This study will quantify the impact of seed orientation on the dosimetry.
METHODS: 3D seed positions and θ and φ polar angles were obtained using five independent fluoroscopic images for 287 patients. Five dose calculation methods are compared: TG43-1D (1), TG43-2D parallel to implant axis (2) and with orientations (3), Monte Carlo (MC) simulations parallel (4), and MC simulations with orientations (5). geant4 v4.9.6 MC simulations were made in 1 mm3 voxelized geometries based on the DICOM-RT information. Materials were assigned using thresholds based on the HU number, as recommended in TG186 reports. Seed voxels are overridden with prostatic materials and the layered mass geometry (Enger et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 57(19), 6269-6277 (2012)) allows subsequent placement of the source geometry. 500 million histories were used per patient. 3D dose and DVHs for each structure were calculated.
RESULTS: The various seed orientations do not result in statistically significant differences on the dose metrics for the clinical target volume (CTV) or the urethra, based on the Student t-test p-value. Difference as low as -0.238% and 0.059% has been seen on the CTV D90, respectively, for the MC and the TG43. The difference between parallel and oriented calculations for the organs at risk (OARs) can differ by 2% on average.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results from this study, seed orientations have no significant impact of CTV and urethra dose metrics but can affect OARs that are external to the CTV.
Collins Fekete CA, Plamondon M, Martin AG, Vigneault E, Verhaegen F, Beaulieu L. Are you the author?
Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et D'optique et Centre de Recherche Sur le Cancer, Université Laval, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada; Département de Radio-oncologie et CRCHU de Québec, CHU de Québec, Québec G1R 2J6, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6201 BN, The Netherlands; Medical Physics Unit, McGill University Health Centre and Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3G 1A4, Canada.
Reference: Med Phys. 2014 Oct;41(10):101704.