A dosimetric comparison of ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer - Abstract

Background: We compared target and normal tissue dosimetric indices between ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Material and Methods: Ten patients were treated definitively for localized prostate cancer with SBRT to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to a volume encompassing the prostate only. Dose-volume constraints were applied to the rectum, bladder, penile bulb, femoral heads, and prostatic and membranous urethra. Three-field passively scattered proton plans were retrospectively generated using target volumes from the same patients. Dosimetric indices were compared between the SBRT and proton plans using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: All dose constraints were achieved using both ultra-hypofractionated passively scattered proton and SBRT planning. Proton plans demonstrated significant improvement over SBRT in mean dose delivered to the penile bulb (5.2 CGE vs. 11.4 Gy; p = 0.002), rectum (6.7 CGE vs. 10.6 Gy; p = 0.002), and membranous urethra (32.2 CGE vs. 34.4 Gy; p = 0.006) with improved target homogeneity resulting in a significant reduction in hot spots and volumes of tissue exposed to low doses of radiation. Compared to proton planning, SBRT planning resulted in significant improvement in target conformality with a mean index of 1.17 versus 1.72 (p = 0.002), resulting in a dose reduction to the volume of bladder receiving more than 90% of the PD (V32.6, 7.5% vs. 15.9%; p = 0.01) and mean dose to the left (7.1 Gy vs. 10.4 CGE; p = 0.004) and right (4.0 Gy vs. 10.9 CGE; p = 0.01) femoral heads.

Conclusion: Target and normal tissue dose constraints for ultra-hypofractionated definitive radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer are readily achieved using both CK SBRT and passively scattered proton-based therapy suggesting feasibility of either modality.

Written by:
Kole TP, Nichols RC, Lei S, Wu B, Huh SN, Morris CG, Lee S, Tong M, Mendenhall NP, Dritschilo A, Collins SP.   Are you the author?
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Reference: Acta Oncol. 2014 Sep 17:1-7.
doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.953260


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 25227898

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

E-Newsletters

Newsletter subscription

Free Daily and Weekly newsletters offered by content of interest

The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are rapidly advancing. Sign up today for articles, videos, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Subscribe