BACKGROUND: Histologically identified intraprostatic incision (IPI) into malignant glands is associated with an increase in biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP).
FREE DAILY AND WEEKLY NEWSLETTERS OFFERED BY CONTENT OF INTEREST
Did you find this article relevant? Subscribe to UroToday-GUOncToday!
The fields of GU Oncology and Urology are advancing rapidly including new treatments, enrolling clinical trials, screening and surveillance recommendations along with updated guidelines. Join us as one of our subscribers who rely on UroToday as their must-read source for the latest news and data on drugs. Sign up today for blogs, video conversations, conference highlights and abstracts from peer-review publications by disease and condition delivered to your inbox and read on the go.
However, the predictor of IPI is poorly evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for IPI into cancer during RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1993 and July 2013, 19 986 men with clinically localized PCa underwent RP at our institution. This study includes 14 434 cases that had complete clinicopathologic data. IPI was defined as an iatrogenic incision into the prostate resulting in the presence of malignant glands at the inked surgical margin, regardless of accompanying pathologic features.
INTERVENTION: Open, retropubic, robot-assisted laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic RP.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted for risk factors of IPI in RP specimens.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The overall incidence of IPI into malignant tissue was noted in 410 (2.8%) cases. In multivariable analysis, obesity, lower prostate weight, surgeon experience, and pure laparoscopic RP were associated with a higher risk of IPI. The odds ratios (OR) for body mass index and prostate weight were 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08; p< 0.001) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99, p< 0.001), respectively. The ORs for surgeon experience (>250 cases) and pure laparoscopic RP compared to open RP were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.90, p=0.005) and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.35-3.11; p=0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of IPI during RP is higher in men with obesity and lower prostate weight. In addition, a pure laparoscopic RP and the early series of each surgeon were associated with a higher risk of IPI. However, tumor characteristics were not associated with the IPI occurrence.
PATIENT SUMMARY: Intraprostatic incision occurrence is associated with obesity, small prostate, and surgeon experience and laparoscopic technique but not Gleason score and tumor stage.
Park SW, Readal N, Jeong BC, Humphreys EB, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Han M. Are you the author?
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea; Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Reference: Eur Urol. 2014 Jul 31. pii: S0302-2838(14)00652-6.