NADiA ProsVue prostate-specific antigen slope is an independent prognostic marker for identifying men at reduced risk of clinical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy - Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate the hypothesis that men displaying serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) slopes ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo after prostatectomy, measured using a new immuno-polymerase chain reaction diagnostic test (NADiA ProsVue), have a reduced risk of clinical recurrence as determined by positive biopsy, imaging findings, or death from prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 4 clinical sites, we selected a cohort of 304 men who had been followed up for 17.6 years after prostatectomy for clinical recurrence. We assessed the prognostic value of a PSA slope cutpoint of 2.0 pg/mL/mo against established risk factors to identify men at low risk of clinical recurrence using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS: The univariate hazard ratio of a PSA slope >2.0 pg/mL/mo was 18.3 (95% confidence interval 10.6-31.8) compared with a slope ≤2.0 pg/mL/mo (P < .0001). The median disease-free survival interval was 4.8 years vs >10 years in the 2 groups (P < .0001). The multivariate hazard ratio for PSA slope with the covariates of preprostatectomy PSA, pathologic stage, and Gleason score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval 5.4-17.8), an 89.8% risk reduction for men with PSA slopes ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo (P < .0001). The Gleason score (< 7 vs ≥7) was the only other significant predictor (hazard ratio 5.4, 95% confidence interval 2.1-13.8, P = .0004).

CONCLUSION: Clinical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is difficult to predict using established risk factors. We have demonstrated that a NADiA ProsVue PSA slope of ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo after prostatectomy is prognostic for a reduced risk of prostate cancer recurrence and adds predictive power to the established risk factors.

Written by:
Moul JW, Lilja H, Semmes OJ, Lance RS, Vessella RL, Fleisher M, Mazzola C, Sarno MJ, Stevens B, Klem RE, McDermed JE, Triebell MT, Adams TH.   Are you the author?
Division of Urologic Surgery and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Reference: Urology. 2012 Oct 26. pii: S0090-4295(12)01034-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.080


PubMed Abstract
PMID: 23107099

Go "Beyond the Abstract" - Read an article written by the authors for UroToday.com

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section