A new preoperative nomogram to predict minimal prostate cancer: Accuracy and error rates compared to other tools to select patients for active surveillance - Abstract

Tissugen Pty. Ltd., University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.

School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.

 

 

We designed and fully evaluated the performance of a nomogram to identify patients with prostate cancer who may be suitable for active surveillance.

We developed a nomogram to predict the probability of minimal prostate cancer (total tumor volume less than 0.5 cc, organ confined disease and no Gleason pattern 4 or 5) using preoperative data on 2,525 Australian patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Accuracy and error rates at multiple probability cutoffs were compared with those of contemporary Epstein criteria and the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance trial inclusion criteria when applied to these patients. High risk disease was defined as 1 or more adverse characteristics (including positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, 50% or greater Gleason pattern 4/5 and/or tumor volume 4.0 cc or greater) at radical prostatectomy.

Minimal cancer was confirmed in 152 men (6.0%) at prostatectomy. The bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy of our nomogram was 93.3% vs 89.1% and 91.0% for Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance and Epstein criteria, respectively. For men with a nomogram derived minimal cancer probability of 0% to 4.9%, 5.0% to 19.9%, 20.0% to 34.9%, 35.0% to 49.9% and 50.0% to 71.0% the rate of high risk disease was 70.8%, 37.8%, 22.4%, 9.0% and 3.8%, respectively. In contrast, the rate of high risk disease for men who met Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance and Epstein criteria were 17.1% and 13.9%, respectively.

A detailed breakdown of the expected rates of false-positive results and high risk disease associated with the nomogram derived probability of minimal cancer would provide more complete information to clinicians and patients on which to base therapeutic clinical decisions for presumed early stage prostate cancer.

Written by:
O'Brien BA, Cohen RJ, Ryan A, Sengupta S, Mills J.   Are you the author?

Reference: J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1811-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.060

PubMed Abstract
PMID: 21944097

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

 

 

email news signup