Radical retropubic prostatectomy: A review of outcomes and side-effects - Abstract

Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna Stråket 11 B, Göteborg, Sweden.

 

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is worldwide probably the most common procedure to treat localized prostate cancer (PC). Due to a more widespread use of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing, patients operated today are often younger and have organ confined disease justifying a more preservative surgery. At the same time, surgical technique has improved resulting in lower risk of permanent side-effects. This paper aims to give an overview of results from modern surgery regarding cancer control and side-effects. A brief overview of the history is given.

A literature research identified recently published papers focusing on outcome and side-effects after RP.

One large randomized study (SPCG-4) compared RP and watchful waiting (WW). The study showed that RP was superior to WW in preventing local progression (RR = 0.36), distant metastasis (RR = 0.65) and death from PC (RR = 0.65). Observational studies also show a better outcome for men treated with RP compared to WW. Peri-operative mortality after RP is low in most material around 0.1%. The risk of stricture of the vesico-urethral anastomosis has decreased with improved technique from historically 10-20% to a low incidence of around 2-9% today. Also the risk of incontinence has declined with improved technique. However, while the rates of severe incontinence is usually very low, as many as 30% still report light incontinence after long-term follow-up. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is still a frequent side-effect after RP. This risk is dependent on age, pre-operative sexual function, surgical technique and other risk factors for ED such as smoking, diabetes, etc. In selected subgroups the risk of ED is low. Inguinal hernia is a more recently described complication after open retropubic RP with a postoperative incidence of 15-20% within three years of surgery.

RP is an effective method to achieve cancer control in selected patients. With modern technique it is a safe procedure with a low risk of permanent side-effects except for ED.

Written by:
Hugosson J, Stranne J, Carlsson SV.   Are you the author?

Reference: Acta Oncol. 2011 Jun;50 Suppl 1:92-7.
doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.535848

PubMed Abstract
PMID: 21604947

UroToday.com Prostate Cancer Section

 

 

email news signup