In health care, monitoring of quality indicators (QIs) in general urology remains underdeveloped in comparison to other clinical specialties.
To identify, synthesise, and appraise QIs that monitor in-hospital care for urology patients.
This systematic review included peer-reviewed articles identified via Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Global Health, Google Scholar, and grey literature from 2000 to February 19, 2021. The review was carried out under the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and used the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) tool for quality assessment.
A total of 5111 articles and 62 government agencies were screened for QI sets. There were a total of 57 QI sets included for analysis. Most QIs focused on uro-oncology, with prostate, bladder, and testicular cancers the most represented. The most common QIs were surgical QIs in uro-oncology (positive surgical margin, surgical volume), whereas in non-oncology the QIs most frequently reported were for treatment and diagnosis. Out of 61 articles, only four scored a total of ≥50% on the AIRE tool across four domains. Aside from QIs developed in uro-oncology, general urological QIs are underdeveloped and of poor methodological quality and most lack testing for both content validity and reliability.
There is an urgent need for the development of methodologically robust QIs in the clinical specialty of general urology for patients to enable standardised quality of care monitoring and to improve patient outcomes.
We investigated a range of quality indicators (QIs) that provide health care professionals with feedback on the quality of their care for patients with general urological diseases. We found that aside from urological cancers, there is a lack of QIs for general urology. Hence, there is an urgent need for the development of robust and disease-specific QIs in general urology.
European urology focus. 2022 Dec 26 [Epub ahead of print]
Harvey Jia Wei Koh, Emma Whitelock-Wainwright, Dragan Gasevic, David Rankin, Lorena Romero, Mark Frydenberg, Sue Evans, Stella Talic
Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia., Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia; Cabrini Healthcare, Malvern, Australia., Ian Potter Library, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia., Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia., School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia., Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: .