Partial prostatectomy has been described as an alternative to focal therapy for the management of localized low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
To describe early outcomes and technique for single-port (SP) transvesical partial prostatectomy.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening remains the mainstay for early detection of prostate cancer. Although PSA is a nonspecific prostate cancer biomarker, its specificity for high grade prostate cancer can be enhanced by pre-biopsy liquid biomarkers including the Exosome Dx Prostate IntelliScore (EPI) test.
Although radical prostatectomy is associated with good long-term oncological outcomes, approximately 30% of patients present biochemical recurrence, whereupon salvage treatments are required. Identification of novel molecular biomarkers to predict cancer behavior is clinically important.
Prostate health index (PHI) and, more recently, Proclarix have been proposed as serum biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate Proclarix and PHI for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
Cabazitaxel is an effective treatment of post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to assess the sequencing impact and identify prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes in mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel.
A number of genomic classifiers are available to aid in shared decision-making for men with localized prostate cancer; however, there is no high-level evidence assessing their clinical utility. The two randomized controlled trials in this report prospectively evaluate the use of gene expression classifier testing at the time of cancer diagnosis and after surgical treatment.
The addition of either docetaxel or an androgen receptor signalling pathway inhibitor (ARSi) to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has become the standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients.
Primary care providers can collaborate with urologists to ensure men with low risk prostate cancer on active surveillance receive followup testing and adhere to the management strategy, yet primary care provider attitudes about active surveillance and their roles remain unknown.
Since there was no consensus on treatment options for localized prostate cancer, we performed a retrospective study to compare the long-term survival benefit of radiotherapy (RT) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Taiwan.
This study aimed to examine adverse health outcomes associated with receipt of definitive treatments (prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT] and brachytherapy).
We identified men aged 65 years and older who received a new diagnosis of localized prostate cancer from 4 state cancer registries (CA, FL, NJ, and TX) during the years 2006 to 2013.
